簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 蔡佩芬
Pei-Fen Tsai
論文名稱: 企業財務營運總部導入決策支援系統之研究-以Y集團企業為例
A Study of Implementing D.S.S to Corporate Financial Department at Headquarter — An Example on Y Business Group
指導教授: 陳正綱
Cheng-Kang Chen
口試委員: 周子銓
Tzu-Chuan Chou
洪大為
Ta-Wei Hung
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 資訊管理系
Department of Information Management
論文出版年: 2008
畢業學年度: 96
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 152
中文關鍵詞: 財務營運總部商業智慧決策支援系統企業資源規劃線上分析處理資料倉儲
外文關鍵詞: BI(Business Intelligence)、Headquarter、DSS, ERP(Enterprise Resource Planning), OLAP(On-line Analysis Process), Data Walehouse
相關次數: 點閱:319下載:3
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 當企業的版圖日益擴大,決策者在擬定經營決策營運方針時,必需考慮的因素愈來愈多,必須多方蒐集適切的資訊,才能快速及正確的訂定決策,有效的策略來自於正確及時的資訊,而正確及時的資訊則來自於完整的資訊系統。
    在企業完成企業資源規劃之建置後,日常交易的資料處理已相當完備。但大量資料的累積,所產生的龐大決策價值,將是企業下一步要深思、掘取用以提昇競爭力之所在。為彌補企業資源規劃系統在決策與分析方面的不足,商業智慧的導入可在原有系統下,依據企業本身的需求,藉由線上分析處理提供即時、正確的決策參考。本研究是以企業集團內企業資源規劃系統所累積之的數據資料為基礎,利用資料倉儲與線上分析處理技術,將龐雜以及散亂的資料整合、分析以提供企業財務營運總部之專業經理人員,作為決策參考的依據。
    本論文基於集團企業中財務營運總部決策支援之觀點,目的在財務營運總部中的各單位建置相關決策管理系統,資料來自於企業資源規劃系統之日常交易資料,並利用線上分析處理技術予以分析,加上訂定之管理指標等,提供財務營運總部決策支援。我們使用Microsoft SQL Server 2005等應用工具做資料的處理、分析與界面的設計,提供給使用者一個明確的資料分析結果和清楚的決策輔助,亦即提供最新且即時之集團企業內各公司之相關決策資料,以多維度方式呈現,供決策者據以作為決策資訊。
    根據前述的研究,歸納出本決策支援系統對企業的效益如下:
    一、有形效益:
    根據個案企業及個案企業之體系公司在決策系統導入前後之人力節省成本降低及產值增加的指標實際量化計算。
    二、無形效益:
    (1)提昇與強化公司發展,投資策略及投資績效。
    (2)提高經營決策速度及品質。
    (3)增加對海外營運單位的管理控制。
    (4)節省預算編列時間。
    (5)擴大投資管理範疇及深度,取得先行指標與改善對策。
    (6)降低投資風險。
    (7)提昇投資關係,強化公司競爭力。
    (8)降低人工作業疏失造成的財務損失。
    (9)避免未能即時掌握資訊導致資金缺口。
    (10)提升財務中心洞察力,更精準預估短期借款天期。
    (11)快速反應集團財務關鍵性指標,加強決策速度與品質。
    (12)增加全員達成預算的共識。
    (13)減少人工作業疏失,造成資訊不正確,影響決策品質。
    (14)提升工作品質及人員士氣。
    (15)嚴格把關與控管海外核心企業級及可直接掌控關係企業之資金運作及到位情形,以確實掌握整個集團之財務運作。
    (16)提高AP/AR管理效率。
    (17)快速正確反應客戶之付款情況,降低與客戶間收款之風險。
    (18)提昇體系整體效益。
    企業導入決策系統的成效,不容易去評估。本研究透過導入前後的成本降低及產值增加的KPI指標去做評估,加上使用者的觀感來評估導入前後的效益會是比較容易評估的方式。本研究發展之各項決策系統,可供類似之集團企業參考應用,以提升競爭力。


    With the increasing field of nowadays enterprises, the decision makers have to consider more and more factors and collect multiple and suitable information when they frame their management decision so that they can get the most efficient and accurate information system for the company.
    After the build of enterprise resource planning, the process of daily trading database is quite complete. The next step for the enterprise to consider is that using the value which is based on numerous databases to promote business competition. In order to recover insufficient parts toward decision making and analysis of enterprise resource system planning, leading Business Intelligence into the original system is necessary. We can evaluate the requirement of enterprise itself and offer the instant and proper strategy reference through the database analysis.
    This research is based upon the increasing database resource of the conglomerate and using the technology of database walehouse on-line analysis to analyze and integrate numerous and complicated databases so that to provide the professional financial managers powerful reference as the base of strategy and policy making.
    The dissertation is founded upon the view point of decision support from head financial department in the enterprise groups. The purpose of it is constructing relevant decision support system to each division of head financial department. The system is through on-line analysis system to analyze the source which is from daily trading database of the enterprise system organization. Moreover, the system can also set up the management target to offer the decision backup for head financial department.
    The appliance tools we use for processing and analyzing databases and for designing the interface are Microsoft SQL Server 2005, which provide the users a definite result of database analysis and specific decision aid; also, which offer the most update and instant some relevant decision information of each group in the enterprise. The resources can become the basement of decision information for the decision makers. The decision system which is developed in this research can provide reference and appliance to other enterprises which can increase the competition of their conglomerate.
    According to the previous research,we summarize the effect of DSS to enterprises as below:

    1.Tangible Efficiency
    It is based upon the actual quantification of reducing the labor cost saving and the productivity value increasing KPI which shows the difference before and after by taking DSS into the case study of one enterprise and the its subsidiary company.
    2.Intangible Efficiency
    (1)It is with the purpose of enhancing and reinforcing the development of enterprise, investment strategy and investment performance.
    (2)It is also enhancing the speed and quality of management decisions.
    (3)It is on the purpose of enlarging the category and depth of investing management and of obtaining the leading KPI and the strategy of improvement.
    (4)It is for reducing the risk of investment.
    (5)It is for enhancing the relationship of investment and reinforcing the competition ability of the enterprise.
    (6)It is maily focus upon reducing the finance loss caused by personnel operation mistakes
    (7)It is to avoid having the capital gap by not having the update information.
    (8)It is to reinforce the finance observation ability in order to forecast the short-term loan days precisely.
    (9)It is to response the key of the groups KPI on finance rapidly and to enhance the speed and quality of decision making.
    (10)It is on the purpose of increasing the common sense and agreement to all the teammates on achieving budget planning.
    (11)It is to reduce the personnel operation mistakes so as to avoid having incorrect data information to influence the quality of decision making.
    (12)It is to promote job quality and personnel power spirit.
    (13)It can control the core of overseas enterprises strictly and monitor the capital situation and arrival time directly so as to control the financial operation way of whole group.
    (14)It is to enhance the efficiency of AP/AR management.
    (15)It can show the quickest feedback of the customers payable status in order to reduce the risk of receiving payments from customers.
    (16)It is to raise the eccect of the whole business group.
    The effect of taking DSS into the enterprises is not easy to evaluate. This case study evaluates the effect through the cost reduction and KPI of productivity value increasing and compares the difference before and after of taking DDS. Moreover, adding the endusers’ comments to evaluate the effect is the easier method to evaluate. Each decision support system in this case study can be used and referred by any similar groups or enterprises so as to increase the competition ability of them.

    目 錄 摘 要 I ABSTRACT IV 誌 謝 IX 第1章 緒論 3 1.1 研究背景與動機 3 1.2 研究目的 4 1.3 研究方法 6 1.4 研究範圍與限制 8 第2章 文獻探討 9 2.1 商業智慧(BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE, BI) 10 2.1.1商業智慧定義 11 2.1.2商業智慧演進過程 13 2.1.3商業智慧系統架構 13 2.2資料倉儲 14 2.2.1資料倉儲的定義 14 2.2.2資料倉儲的架構 16 2.3 線上分析系統 18 2.3.1 線上分析系統的定義 18 2.3.2 OLAP 和OLTP的差別 20 2.3.3 OLAP的資料分析方式 20 2.3.4 OLAP的架構 21 2.4企業營運總部 21 2.4.1企業營運總部營運範圍認定要點 22 2.4.2政府相關行政優惠及專案輔導措施 24 2.5績效評估理論 26 2.5.1單一指標評估或多元指標評估 27 2.5.2財務報表分析法與全面分析法 28 2.5.3策略性績效評估 31 2.5.4平衡計分卡 33 2.6整合性資訊系統架構 38 第3章 財務營運總部決策支援系統建構 42 3.1系統規劃 42 3.2系統目標 43 3.3系統分析 45 3.3.1作業流程 45 3.3.2系統各模組架構及功能 46 3.4開發設計 57 3.4.1資訊架構 58 3.4.2財務營運總部系統範圍 59 3.4.3網路架構 60 3.4.4財務營運總部系統整體電子化架構 61 3.4.5建置財務營運總部的決策系統 62 3.5導入上線 64 3.5.1工作項目內容及執行方式 64 3.6系統效益評估指標訂定 65 3.6.1有形效益 65 3.6.2無形效益 68 第4章 個案應用及導入效益分析 70 4.1個案公司背景 70 4.2個案公司營運總部組織架構及各部門人力配置 72 4.3個案公司財務總部分工 75 4.4個案公司前三年營運資料 77 4.5體系現況分析 79 4.5.1總部與主要關係企業間財務運作現況分析 79 4.5.2體系間資訊技術應用現況 80 4.5.3財務營運總部作業流程現況 82 4.6個案公司系統導入工作項目及時程 83 4.7個案公司系統呈現與決策分析 87 4.7.1投資管理模組 87 4.7.2資金管理模組 88 4.7.3籌融資管理模組 90 4.7.4預算管理模組 91 4.7.5應收應付帳款管理模組 92 4.7.6經營管理績效評核系統 95 4.7.7商業智慧Dash-board應用 97 4.8個案公司成果效益檢討 112 4.8.1個案公司有形效益 112 4.8.2個案公司無形效益 116 第5章 結論與未來研究方向 118 5.1研究結論 118 5.2未來研究方向 119 參考文獻 121 附錄一 績效評核系統中依平衡計分卡四構面設計之衡量指標 128 圖索引 圖 1-1 研究流程架構 6 圖 2-1 商業智慧演進過程 13 圖 2-2 商業智慧系統架構 14 圖 2-3 一般資料倉儲架構 18 圖 2-4 策略性績效評估圖 31 圖 2-5 成功策略績效評估模式牛眼圖 32 圖 2-6 平衡計分卡架構 37 圖 3-1財務營運總部核心作業架構圖 42 圖 3-2決策流程改變前架構圖 45 圖 3-3決策流程改變後架構圖 46 圖 3-4投資管理模組系統架構 47 圖 3-5投資管理模組系統架構 49 圖 3-6資金管理模組系統架構 50 圖 3-7預算管理系統架構 51 圖 3-8應收帳款管理系統架構 54 圖 3-9應付帳款管理系統架構 55 圖 3-10經營管理績效評核系統架構 56 圖 3-11 財務營運總部系統網路架構 61 圖 3-12財務營運總部電子化架構圖 61 圖 3-13財務營運總部核心作業架構圖 62 圖 3-14財務營運總部整合性管理電子化策略架構圖 63 圖 4-1組織架構及各部門人力配置圖 72 圖 4-2個案公司五大總部關係圖 73 圖 4-3個案公司財務總部與集團間關係圖 75 圖 4-4 總部與主要關係企業間財務運作現況圖 80 圖 4-5 個案公司網路架構現況圖 81 圖 4-6 個案公司E化現況圖 82 圖 4-7 個案公司財務營運總部作業流程現況圖 82 圖 4-8 投資管理模組系統呈現-主畫面 87 圖 4-9 投資管理模組系統呈現-報表 87 圖 4-10 投資管理模組系統呈現-異常指標管理 88 圖 4-11 資金管理模組系統呈現-主畫面 88 圖 4-12 資金管理模組系統呈現-資金分配報表 89 圖 4-13 籌融資管理模組系統呈現-主畫面 90 圖 4-14 籌融資管理模組系統呈現-銀行額度查詢 90 圖 4-15 預算管理模組系統呈現-主畫面 91 圖 4-16 預算管理模組系統呈現-預算版本進度控管 91 圖 4-17 應收管理模組系統呈現-銀行連線入帳 92 圖 4-18 應收管理模組系統呈現-入帳後通知 92 圖 4-19 應收帳款管理模組系統呈現-帳款自動沖銷 93 圖 4-20 應收帳款管理模組系統呈現-逾期應收帳通知處理 93 圖 4-21 應付帳款管理模組系統呈現-供應商資料維護 94 圖 4-22 應付帳款管理模組系統呈現-自動發送應付款項通知 94 圖 4-23 經營管理模組系統呈現-BSC財務面績效查詢 95 圖 4-24 經營管理模組系統呈現-BSC客戶關係面績效查詢 96 圖 4-25 經營管理模組系統呈現-BSC內部流程面績效查詢 96 圖 4-26 經營管理模組系統呈現-BSC學習與成長面績效查詢 97 圖 4-27 財務營運總部決策支援系統-戰情室 97 圖 4-28戰情室-投資管理異常情況面板 98 圖 4-29戰情室-投資管理(投資比例) 98 圖 4-30戰情室-投資管理(同業比較) 99 圖 4-31戰情室-投資管理(經營績效) 99 圖 4-32戰情室-投資管理(類別分析) 100 圖 4-33戰情室-投資管理(產業別股東權益報酬) 100 圖 4-34戰情室-投資管理(類別統計分析) 101 圖 4-35戰情室-預算管理(預算達成) 102 圖 4-36戰情室-預算管理(各事業部) 102 圖 4-37戰情室-預算管理(各地區) 103 圖 4-38戰情室-預算管理(各廠) 103 圖 4-39戰情室-預算管理(比較實績與預算差異) 104 圖 4-40戰情室-資金管理(銀行存款金額彙總趨勢) 104 圖 4-41戰情室-資金管理(各區域、各子公司之銀行存款金額趨勢) 105 圖 4-42戰情室-資金管理(CASH POOLING總額趨勢) 105 圖 4-43戰情室-資金管理(各子公司CASH POOLING金額明細) 106 圖 4-44戰情室-資金管理(各子公司CASH POOLING金額趨勢圖) 106 圖 4-45戰情室-籌融資管理(全集團銀行借款成本變化) 107 圖 4-46戰情室-籌融資管理(借款成本比較) 107 圖 4-47戰情室-應付帳款管理(應付款匯款通知E-MAIL傳送比例) 108 圖 4-48戰情室-應付帳款管理(下一層各廠未通知清單) 108 圖 4-49戰情室-應收帳款管理(應收帳款週轉天數比較) 109 圖 4-50戰情室-應收帳款管理(應收帳款週轉天數趨勢) 110 圖 4-51戰情室-經營管理(存貨週轉天數比較) 111 圖 4-52戰情室-經營管理(存貨週轉天數趨勢) 111 表索引 表 2-1 商業智慧的定義 12 表 2-2 「企業營運總部營運範圍證明函」及「企業營運總部認證書」申請方式及適用之優惠措施 23 表 2-3企業營運總部人才雇用優惠措施。 25 表 2-4企業營運總部土地優惠措施 25 表 2-5企業營運總部租稅優惠措施 26 表 2-6 ARIS說明 40 表 3-1 投資管理模組功能清單一覽表 47 表 3-2 籌融資管理模組系統功能清單一覽表 49 表 3-3 資金管理模組系統功能清單一覽表 50 表 3-4 預算管理模組系統功能清單一覽表 52 表 3-5 應收應付管理模組系統功能清單一覽表 55 表 3-6 經營績效評核系統功能清單一覽表 56 表 3-7 財務營運中心系統架構表 58 表 3-8 財務營運中心系統範圍表 59 表 3-9 財務營運總部決策系統導入之工作項目及內容 64 表 3-10 財務營運總部決策系統評估有形效益指標列表一 65 表 3-11 財務營運總部決策系統評估有形效益指標列表二 66 表 3-12 財務營運總部決策系統評估有形效益指標轉換金額公式 67 表 4-1 個案公司人力分析表 73 表 4-2 個案公司過去三年營運狀況表 77 表 4-3 個案公司財務營運總部決策系統導入工作項目及時程 86 表 4-4 經營管理績效評核系統指標一覽表 95 表 4-5 個案公司有形效益分析一覽表 113 表 4-6 體系相關企業有形效益分析一覽表 116

    中文文獻
    [1]王立鈞、石延平、陳陵援,化學,第85∼98頁,台北,正中書局,民國五十六年。
    [2]于泳泓、陳依蘋,平衡計分卡完全教戰守策,梅霖文化事業有限公司,民國95年。
    [3]王國斌,2003,運用平衡計分卡建構台灣地區連鎖藥局供應鏈之績效評估系統,開南管理學院企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    [4]王茁,台灣睿智資訊 顧問群著.謝禮宗編校,商業智慧—企業決勝策略.技術與應用實務 Business Intelligence for the Enterprise
    [5]王媺淑,「BI技術運用在利基客戶名單發掘之研究---以行動電話為例」,國立台北大學,碩士論文,台北,民國89年。
    [6]方世榮譯,Kotler, Philip 著,行銷管理學:分析、計畫、執行與控制,東華書局,民國84 年。
    [7]朱柔若 譯,Neuman, W. L. 原著,2000,社會研究方法-質化與量化取向,揚智文化事業。
    [8]朱道凱,1999,平衡計分卡:資訊時代的策略管理工具,臉譜文化出版,頁57-61。
    [9]朱慧蘭,「商業智慧系統之設計與應用」,中原大學,碩士論文,桃園,民國91年。
    [10]李書行,1995,務實創新的策略性績效評估,會計研究月刊,第113 期:21。
    [11]林傑斌、卓彰賢、張一岑,「資料倉儲理論、設計與應用」,初版,網奕資訊股份有限公司,台北,九十五年七月。
    [12]吳琮璠等著,資訊管理 理論與實務,四版,台北:智勝文化,民國89 年5 月。
    [13]吳琮璠,1996,資訊管理個案研究方法,資訊管理實證研究方法研討會。
    [14]吳安妮,“平衡計分卡轉換策略為行動(上)”,會計研究月刊,第134 期,民國86 年 1 月。
    [15]吳安妮,“平衡計分卡轉換策略為行動(中)”,會計研究月刊,第135 期,民國86 年 2 月。
    [16]吳安妮,“平衡計分卡轉換策略為行動(下)”,會計研究月刊,第136 期,民國86 年3 月。
    [17]周淑娟,以ARIS 為基礎的平衡計分卡系統,私立輔仁大學資訊管理學系碩士論文,民國91 年。
    [18]尚榮安譯,Robert K. Yin 著,2001,個案研究法,弘智文化事業有限公司。
    [19]李卓翰,「資料倉儲理論與實務」,初版,學貫行銷股份有限公司,台北,九十二年七月。
    [20]李淑貞,「台灣科技新創事業的融資策略—以國聯光電為例」,國立交通大學,碩士論文,新竹,民國九十二年。
    [21]林繼文,「網頁資料發掘技術導入網站經營者之研究─以入口網站之分類索引服務為例」,國立政治大學,碩士論文,台北,民國89年。
    [22]黃達業、林容竹編譯,「金融機構管理精要」,Saunders, A. and Cornett, M.M.著,美商麥格羅希爾國際股份有限公司台灣分公司,台北,民國九十三年七月。
    [23]許迪威,2003,建設公司BSC績效評估模式之研究-應用ANP/FUZZY法,台灣科技大學營建工程系碩士論文。
    [24]經濟部產業輔導中心網站: http://www.ciup.org.tw
    [25]榮泰生,1997,策略管理學,華泰文化。
    [26]謝劍平,「現代投資學」,第三版,智勝文化事業有限公司,台北,民國九十二年二月。
    [27]蔡懿穗,「應用商業智慧技術建構Web-based跨企業銷售決策支援系統」,元智大學,碩士論文,桃園,民國90年。
    [28]欒斌,商業智慧的三大手法,經濟部商業現代化雙月刊,34-38 頁 , 民國91 年2 月。

    英文文獻
    [1]Aczel,J., and Saaty, T. L. 1983. “Procedures for Synthesizing Ratio Judgments.” Journal of Mathematical Psychology.
    [2]Adams, S.M., Sarkis,J., and Liles, D 1995. “The Development of Strategic Performance Mertrics.”Engineering Management Journal 7(1):24-32.
    [3] APICS Dictionary. 1996. American Production & Inventory Control Society, 8th Edition.
    [4] APICS Dictionary. 2002. American Production & Inventory Control Society, 10th Edition.
    [5] Appleton, E. L. 1997. “How to Survive ERP.” Datamation, 50-53.
    [6] Arik Ragowsky and Toni M.Somers. 2002. “Enterprise Resource Planning.” Journal of Management Information Systems.
    [7] Ballantine J, Stray S. 1998. “Financial appraisal and the ICT investment decision making process.” Journal of Information Technology 14:3-15.
    [8] Beamon B.M. 1998. “Supply Chain Design and Analysis: Models and Methods.” Production Economics, 281-294.
    [9] Benchmarking Partners and IBM Corp. 1999. “ERP and Beyond: Exceeding ROI Opportunities.”
    [10] Benchmarking Partners, Inc. 1998. “Ten “Go Live” Surprises.”
    [11] Bingi, P., M. Sharma, and Godla, K. 1999. “Critical Issues Affecting an ERP Implementation.” Information Systems Management, 7-14.
    [12] Booth, R. 1996. “Accountants Do It by Proxy.” Management Accounting, 74(5):48.
    [13] Boudreau, M., and Robey, D. 1999. “Organizational Transition to Enterprise Resource Planning Systems: Theoretical Choices for Process Rearch.” Proceeding of the 20th international conference on information systems, Charlotte, 291-299.
    [14] Brown, C. V., I. Vessey, and A. Powell. 2000. “The ERP Purchase Decision: Influential Business and IT Factors.” Proceedings of the Sixth Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), 1029-1032.
    [15] Chase R.B., N.J. Aquilano, and F.R. Jacobs. 1998. Production and Operating Management : Manufacturing and Service, 8th edition.
    [16] Christopher Koch. 2001. “What is ERP?” Chief Information Officer.
    [17] Clarke, P. 1997. “The Balanced Scorecard.” Countancy, 29(3), 25-26.
    [18] Clemons EK, Weber BW. 1990. “Strategic information technology investments:guidelines for decision making.” Journal of Management Information Systems,7(2):10–31.
    [19] Curtis, D. 1985. “The Modern Accounting System.” Financial Executive, 81- 93.
    [20] Davenport, T. H. 1993. “Process Innovation.” Harvard Business School Press.
    [21] Davenport, T. H. 1998. “Putting the Enterprise into the Enterprise System.” Harvard Business Review.
    [22] David C. Yen, David C. Chou, and Jane Chang. 2002. “A synergic analysis for Web-based enterprise resources planning systems.” Computer Standards & Interfaces, 24(4):337-346.
    [23] Deloitte Consulting & Benchmarking Partners, Inc. 1999. “ERP’s Second Wave -Maximizizing the Value of Enterprise Applications and Processes.” A globalResearch Report including Deloitte Consulting’s Perspective: Making ERP spell ROI.
    [24] Eccles, R.G., and N. Nohria. 1992. “Beyond the hype —Rediscovering the essence of management.” Harvard Business School Press.
    [25] Epstein, M. J., and J. F. Manzoni. 1997. “Translating strategy into ction.”Management Accounting, 28-36.
    [26] Evans, H., Ashworth, G., Chellew, M., Davidson, A., and Towers, D. 1996.“Exploiting Activity-Based Information : Easy as ABC.” Management Accounting, 74(7):24-29.
    [27] Faleti, S. A. 2001. “ERP Optimization: Maximize ROI through Improved Performance.” AFP Exchange, (21)26-28.
    [28] Farley, G. A. 1997. “Discovering Supply Chain Management: A roundtableDiscussion.” APICS – The Performance Advantage.
    [29] Gaiss, M. 1998. “Enterprise Performance Management.” Management Accounting, 80(6).
    [30] Gall, M. D., Borg, W. R., and Gall, J.P. 1996. “Education research:An introduction.” 6th eds., New York: Longman.
    [31] Gay, L.R. 1992. “Education research:Competencies for analysis and application.” 4th eds., New York: Merrill.
    [32] Glaser, B.G., and Strauss, A.L. 1967. “The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research.” Aldine Publishing Company.
    [33] Govindarajan, V. 1988. “A contingency approach to strategy implementation at the business-unit level: integrating administrative mechanisms with strategy.” Academy of Management Journal, 31(4):828-853.
    [34] Govindarajan, V., and J. Fisher. 1990. “Strategy, control systems, and resource sharing: Effects on business-unit performance.” Academy of Management Journal, 33(2):259-285.
    [35] Hammer and Champy. 1993. “Reengineering the Corporation :A Manifesto for Business Revolution.” Harper Collins Publishers.
    [36] Hammersley M. 1989. “The dilemma of qualitative method: Herbert Blumer and the Chicago tradition.” London and New York: Routledge.
    [37] Henk, A. A., Bogerd, P., Yucesan, E., and Wassenhove, L. N. V. 2003 “The impact of ERP on supply chain management: Exploratory findings from a European Delphi study.” European Journal of Operational Research.
    [38] Hicks, Donald A. 1997. “The manager’s guide to supply chain and logistics problemsolving tools and techniques.” IIE Solutions, Norcross.
    [39] Hochstrasser B, Griffiths C. 1991. “Controlling IT investment: strategy and management.” Chapman & Hal.
    [40] Holmberg, S. 2000. “A Systems Perspective on Supply Chain Measurements.” International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 30(10):847-868.
    [41] Hong, H.K., & Kim, Y.G. (2002). The critical success factors for ERP implementation: An organizational fit perspective. Information & Management, 40(1), 25-40.
    [42] Horngren, C., Foster, G., and Datar, M. 2000. “Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis.” 9th edition, New Jersey: Prentice Hall International Inc.
    [43] Huizingh, E.K.R.E., and Vrolijk, H.C.J. 1997. “A comparison of verbal and numerical judgments in the analytic hierarchy process.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70(3): 237-247.
    [44] James A. O’Brien. 2002. “Management Information Systems-Managing Information Technology in the E-Business Enterprise.” McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 5th edition.
    [45] Johnson, H., and Kaplan, R. 1987. “Relevance Lost.” Harvard Business School press.
    [46] Kaplan, R., and Norton, D. 1992. “The Balanced Scorecard-Measures that Drive Performance.” Harvard Business Review.
    [47] Kaplan, R., and Norton, D. 1993. “Putting the balanced scorecard to work.” Harvard Business Review.
    [48] Kaplan, R., and Norton, D. 1996. “Using the Balanced Scorecard as A Strategic Management System.” Harvard Business Review.
    [49] Kast, F. E., and Posenzwig, J. E. 1979. “Organization and Management.” New York : McGraw-Hill Book Company, 169.
    [50] Katzell, M. E. 1975. “Productivity: The Measure and the Myth.” New York, Amaeom.
    [51] Koen Milis, Roger Mercken. 2004. “The use of the balanced scorecard for the evaluation of Information and Communication Technology projects.” International Journal of Project Management, 22:87–97.
    [52] Lawshe, C. H. 1975. “A quantitative approach to content validity.” Personnel Psychology, 28(4):563.
    [53] Lipset, S. M., Trow, M., and Coleman, J. 1956. “Union democracy: The inside politics of the International Typographical Union.” New York: Free Press.
    [54] Lynda M., Applegate. 1999. “Corporate Information Systems Management: Text and Cases.” 5th edition, McGraw-Hill.
    [55] Maskell, B. 1986. “Integrated Systems and How to Implement Them.” Management Accounting, 26-28.
    [56] McCutcheon, D. M., and Meredith J. R. 1993 “Conducting case study research in operations management.” Journal of Operations Management, 11(3):239-256.
    [57] Mchugh J. 2000. “Binge and Pruge now we are know how ERP software’s promise died – and who killed it.” eCompany.
    [58] Paul N. Niven. 2002. “Balanced Scorecard Step-by-Step: Maximizing Performance and Maintaining Results.” Wiley.
    [59] Ramesh Sharda, Steve H. Barr, and James C. Mcdonnell. 1998. “Decision support system effectiveness: a review and an empirical test.” Management Science.
    [60] Reinhard, N., and S. Bergamaschi. 2001. “Management of ERP system implementation in Brazil.” 7th Americas Conference on Information Systems(AMCIS), 1098-1104.
    [61] Robert, F.D., and Ernest, H.F. 1992. “Group Decision Support With the Analytic Hierarchy Process.” Decision Support System, (8):99- 124.
    [62] Rosemmann, M., and Wiese, J. 1999. “Measuring the Performance of ERP Software-a Balanced Scorecard Approach.” Proc. 10th ACIS, 773-784.
    [63] Saaty, Thomas L. 1980. “The Analytic Hierarchy Process.” New York: McGraw-Hill.
    [64] Saaty, Thomas L. 1996. “The Analytic Network Process.” RWS Publications.
    [65] Steers, R. M. 1977. “Organizational effectiveness: A behavioral view.” Santa Monica, Calif.: Goodyear Pub. Co.
    [66] Stadtler, H., and Kilger C. 2000. “Supply Chain Management and Advanced Planning : Concepts ,Models ,Software and Case Studies.” Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer.
    [67] Strauss and Juliet Corbin. 1990. “Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques.” Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    [68] Szilagyi, A.D. 1981. “Management and Performance.” Sant Monica, Calif : Goodyear Pub. Co.
    [69] Tatikonda, U. L., and Rao, J. T. 1998. “We Need Dynamic Performance Measures.” Management Accounting.
    [70] Tompkins, J.A. 1995. “The Genesis Enterprise Creating peak-to-peak Performance.” USA.
    [71] Vargas, L.G. 1990. “An Overview of the Analytic Hierarchy Process and Its Applications.” European Journal of Operational Research, (48):2-8.
    [72] Whiting R, Davies J, Knul M. 1996. “Investment appraisal for IT systems.” In: Willcocks L, editor. “Investing in information systems: evaluation and management.” Chapman & Hall.
    [73] Wholey, J. S. 1970. “Federal Evaluation Policy : Analyzing the Effects of Public.” Washing : Urban Institute.
    [74] Yin, R. K. 1983. “The case study method: An annotated bibliography.” COSMOS Corporation.
    [75] Yin, R. K. 1989. “Case Study Research: Design and Methods.” London: Sage Pub.
    [76] Yin, R. K. 1994. “Case study research: design and methods.” London: Sage Pub.

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 2013/07/15 (校內網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (國家圖書館:臺灣博碩士論文系統)
    QR CODE