研究生: |
林俊佑 Chun-Yu Lin |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
低滲透土壤內地工不織布排水效果與改善措施之試驗研究 Experimental Study on Drainage Efficiency and Improvement Measures of Low Permeable Soil with Geosynthetic Drainage Layers |
指導教授: |
楊國鑫
Kuo-Hsin Yang |
口試委員: |
林宏達
Hung-da Lin 吳朝賢 Chau-shian Wu 何嘉浚 Chia-chun Ho |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
工程學院 - 營建工程系 Department of Civil and Construction Engineering |
論文出版年: | 2013 |
畢業學年度: | 101 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 165 |
中文關鍵詞: | 低滲透性土壤 、水力傳導係數 、薄砂層 、長短期滲流 、細顆粒阻塞 |
外文關鍵詞: | Geosynthetic, Low Permeable Soil, Drainage, Sand Layer, Clogging |
相關次數: | 點閱:367 下載:8 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
實際工程中,為了施工方便及成本考量,以及滿足挖填方平衡之需求,常需使用現地細顆粒含量較高的土壤來回填,這類的土壤內含有較高的細顆粒,因此滲透性較差,遇到豪雨來襲,會導致排水不良及孔隙水壓快速累積的問題,最後造成邊坡滑動或是擋土牆體損壞。為了改善低滲透性回填土構造物受到豪雨滲流之排水效果,本研究設計一座橫向滲流儀,以粉土為低滲透性土壤、地工不織布為排水材料、搭配不同厚度之薄砂層(過濾排水層)進行各種複合排水系統之長短期滲流試驗。並於試體上方施加垂直載重模擬覆土壓力,試驗結果發現,無載重時地工不織布對系統滲透性有顯著的提升,但隨著載重作用與長時間滲流使排水層厚度減少以及地工不織布孔隙被土壤顆粒阻塞而降低其排水效率。本研究發現,在地工不織布周圍設置薄砂層後不論有無載重其排水效果皆能有效發揮,且系統滲透係數隨著薄砂層厚度的增加而增加。本研究成果有助於了解地工不織布以及薄砂層對低滲透性土壤的長短期排水改善效果,模擬現地長期暴雨下土壤與地工不織布間之互制行為,作為排水系統最佳化設計依據,於工程實務上減低構造物在豪雨下之受損情形,達到建立永續安全家園之最終目標。
This study carried out a series of horizontal permeability tests to evaluate the permeability and drainage efficiency of low permeable soil with geosynthetic drainage system. The experimental variables include: number of drainage layers, with and without sand layer, and sand layer thickness. The objective of this study is to improve the drainage capacity of low permeable soil for the application of geosynthetic-reinforced soil (GRS) structures backfilled with in-situ soil, typically with low permeability, under typhoon and heavy rainfall conditions. Test results indicate that system short-term permeability is improved as number of drainage layer, and number and thickness of sand layer increase. However, the system permeability decreases as the applied normal pressure, simulating the overburden pressure within retaining structures, increases. The reason of decreasing trend is because the normal pressure would compress the thickness of soil and drainage layer, and meanwhile fine soil particles are likely forced to penetrate into drainage layer which results in the clogging of drainage layer. Regarding the long-term permeability, test results demonstrate that system long-term permeability decreases as time elapse increases and the sand layer thickness decreases. By calculating the degree of retention (DOR), the ratio of mass of soil retained in a geotextile to the mass of the pure geotextile, this study finds DOR decreases as sand layer thickness increases, which provides a strong experimental evidence that the sand layer can effectively improve system permeability by preventing the drainage layer from clogging in long-term. Last, the measured results were compared with the predicted results using theoretical equation for equivalent horizontal hydraulic conductivity of multi-layered soil. The comparison results indicate with absence of normal stress, the measured and predicted system permeability are in a good agreement. However, the theoretical equation was found to overestimate system permeability as normal stress increases.
[1] ASTM (2001), “Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Geotextiles by the Wide-Width Strip Method” Designation: D4595-86.
[2] ASTM (2004), “Standard Test Method for Determining Apparent Opening Size of a Geotextile” Designation: D4751-04.
[3] ASTM (2006), “Standard Test Methods for Maximum Index Density and Unit Weight of Soils Using a Vibratory Table” Designation: D4253.
[4] ASTM (2006), “Standard Test Methods for Minimum Index Density and Unit Weight of Soils and Calculation of Relative Density” Designation: D4254.
[5] ASTM (2006), “Standard Test Method for Measuring the Nominal Thickness of Geosynthetics” Designation: D5199-01.
[6] ASTM (2007), “Standard Test Method for Particle-Size Analysis of Soils” Designation: D422-63.
[7] ASTM (2007), “Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Standard Effort (600kN-m/m3)” Designation: ASTM D698-07.
[8] ASTM (2008), “Standard Test Method for Sieve Analysis of Surfacing for Asphalt Roofing Products” Designation: D452-91.
[9] ASTM (2009), “Standard Test Methods for Water Permeability of Geotextiles by Permittivity” Designation: D4491-99.
[10] ASTM (2009), “Standard Test Method for Measuring Mass per Unit Area of Geotextiles” Designation: D5261-92.
[11] ASTM (2011), “Standard Test Method for Determining the (In-Plane) Hydraulic Transmissivity of a Geosynthrtic by Radial Flow” Designation: D6574-00.
[12] AASHTO (2000), “Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges” American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Seventeenth Edition, Washington, D. C., USA.
[13] Anon (1990), “Designing for Subsurface Drainage” Exxon Chemical Geopolymers, Pontypool, UK.
[14] A. Rollin and G. Lombard (1988), “Mechanisms Affecting Long-term Filtration Behavior of Geotextiles” Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 07, No.1-2, pp. 119−145.
[15] A. Sridharan, S. Murthy, B. R. Bindumadhava and K. Revansiddappa (1991), “Technique for Using Fine-Grained Soil in Reinforced Earth” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 117, No.8, pp. 1174–1190.
[16] A. Sridharan and K. Prakash (2002), “Permeability of Two-layer Soils” Geotechnical Testing Journal, ASTM, 25, No.4, pp. 1–6.
[17] B. R. Christopher and R. P. Stulgis, “Low Permeable Backfill Soils in Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil Walls: State of the Practice in North America” Christopher Consultants, Roswell, GA, USA and Geocomp Corporation, Manchester, NH, USA.
[18] C. Ghosh and K. Yasuhara (2004), “Clogging and Flow Characteristics of a Geosynthetic Drain Confined in Soils Undergoing Consolidation” Geosynthetics International, 11, No.1, pp. 19–34.
[19] D. P. Jaisi, U. Glawe and D. T. Bergado (2005), “Hydraulic Behaviour of Geosynthetic and Granular Landfill Drainage Materials in the Sa Kaeo Landfill, Thailand” Geotextiles and Geomembranes 23, pp. 185–204.
[20] D. V. Raisinghani and B. V. S. Viswanadham (2010), “Evaluation of Permeability Characteristics of a Geosynthetic-Reinforced Soil through Laboratory Tests” Geotextiles and Geomembranes 28, pp. 579–588.
[21] E. M. Palmeira and M. G. Gardoni (2002), “Drainage and Filtration Properties of Non-woven Geotextiles under Confinement Using Different Experimental Techniques” Geotextiles and Geomembranes 20, pp. 97–115.
[22] E. M. Palmeira, R. J. Fannin and Y. P. Vaid (1996), “A Study on the Behavior of Soil–Geotextile Systems in Filtration Tests” Canadian Geotechnical Journal 33, No.4, pp. 899–912.
[23] E. Juarez-Babillo (1983), “General Permeability Change Equation for Soils” In
Proceedings of International Conference on Constitutive Laws for Engineering
Materials, ed. C. S. Desai, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA pp. 205-209.
[24] FHWA (1998), “Geosynthetic Design and Construction Guidelines” Federal Highway Administration Demonstration, Hl-95-038, April.
[25] FHWA (1997), “Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls and Reinforced Soil Slopes Design and Construction Guidelines” Federal Highway Administration Demonstration Project 82, USA.
[26] H. I. Ling, T. H. Wu and Jun-Nishimura (1993), “Hydraulic Conductivity of Geotextiles under Typical Operational Conditions” Geotextiles and Geomembranes 12, pp. 509–542.
[27] J. C. Chai and N. Miura., “Long-term Transmissivity of Geotextile Confined in Clay” Geosynthetics-7th ICG.
[28] J. Collin (1997), “Design Manual for Segmental Retaining Walls” 2nd Edition, National Concrete Masonry Association (NCMA), Herndon, VA, USA.
[29] J. G. Zornberg and J. K. Mitchell (1994), “Reinforced Soil Structures with Poorly Drainage Backfills Part1: Reinforcement Interactions and Functions” Geosynthetics International, Vol. 2, No.1, pp. 103-147.
[30] J. G. Zornberg, R. J. Barrows, B. R. Christopher and J. K. Mitchell (1995), “Constructing a Geotextile-Reinforced Slope” GFR, Vol 13, No.7, IFAI, pp. 26-28.
[31] J. Masounave, A. L. Rollin and R. Denis (1980), “Prediction of Permeability of Nonwoven Geotextiles from Morphometry Analysis” Journal of Microscopy 121 No.1, pp. 99–100.
[32] J. Młynarek, L. Bogumił, R. Andrel and B. Gilles (1991), “Soil Geotextile System Interaction” Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 10, No.2, pp. 161−176.
[33] J. P. Giroud (1996), “Granular Filters and Geotextile Filters” In: Lafleur, J., Rollin, A. (Eds.), GeoFilters’96. Montreal, Canada, pp. 565–680.
[34] J. P. Giroud, J. G. Zornberg and A. Zhao (2000), “Hydraulic Design of Geosynthetic and Granular Collection Layer” Geosynthetics International, 07 No.4-6, pp. 433-452.
[35] J. P. Gourc, Y. Faure, A. Rollin and J. Lafleur (1982), “Structural Permeability Law of Geotextiles” Second International Conference on Geotextiles, Las Vegas, USA, Vol. 1, pp. 149–154.
[36] J. Y. Wang (2012), “Experimental Study on Seepage Failure of Uniform and Gap-Graded Soils” M.S, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei, Taiwan.
[37] K. H. Yang (2009), “Stress Distribution within Geosynthetic-Reinforced Soil Structures” Ph.D dissertation, the University of Texas at Austin, USA.
[38] M. Bourdillon, G. Didier and J. Gielly (1977), “Utilisation des Produits Non-tisses pour Ie Drainage” Proceedings of the International Conference on the Use of Fabrics in Geotechnics, Paris, Vol. 2, pp. 279-284.
[39] R. M. Koerner (1990), “Designing with Geosynthetics, 2nd edn” Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 84-90, 120-5, 228-35, 334-59, 478, 481, 523-79, Geopipe supplement.
[40] Rong-Her Chen, Chia-Chun Hoand Wen-Bin Chung (2008), “The Filtration Mechanism and Micro-Observation of Soil-Geotextile Systems under Cyclic Flows” Journal of Geoengineering, Vol. 3, pp. 101-112.
[41] S. J. DeBerardino (1992), “Drainage Principle and the Use of Geosynthetics ” Geotextiles and Geomembranes 11, pp. 449–459.
[42] T. Iryo and R. K. Rowe (2005), “Hydraulic Behaviour of Soil-Geocomposite Layers in Slopes” Geosynthetics International 12, No.3, pp. 145–155.
[43] T. W. Lambe and R. V. Whitman (1969), “Soil Mechanics” John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, USA, pp. 281-294.
[44] 李維峰、廖振程、黃奉琦,「加勁擋土結構應用於交通土木工程規範草案之研究」,交通部,中華地工材料協會(MOTC-STAO-96-04),中華民國 (2008)。