研究生: |
劉代燻 Tai-Hsun Liu |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
輪胎業資源基礎論分析之個案研究 A Case Study of Resourced-Based Theory in Tire Industry |
指導教授: |
劉代洋
Day-Yang Liu |
口試委員: |
陳俊男
Chun-Nan Chen 邱敬仁 Jing-Ren Qiu |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 財務金融研究所 Graduate Institute of Finance |
論文出版年: | 2019 |
畢業學年度: | 107 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 77 |
中文關鍵詞: | 資源基礎理論 、輪胎業 |
外文關鍵詞: | Resource-based theory, Tire industry |
相關次數: | 點閱:567 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究主要透過文獻探討,探究資源資基礎理論之核心論點與研究架構,及該理論應用之相關研究、了解輪胎業之產業重大議題、產業關鍵成功因素及產業主要運用策略。另透過個案分析法,以資源基礎理論深入探究個案公司成為業界龍頭之因,即其如何擁有核心資源,核心資源有何特性,又其如何建構核心競爭力以長期取得市場租金。
研究發現,目前對於核心資源及核心競爭力的定義,不管是學術抑或實務上,皆有「模糊不清」的現象,或許因為兩者本質相近,又或者因為核心競爭力主要是由某一核心資源所組成,而某項核心資源的建構又可能與其他的核心資源有關,層層建構的過程,當中的關係交錯、相互影響,模糊了之間的因果關係。因此,對於具有知名品牌的公司,其品牌價值通常會被認為是該公司「核心競爭力」之一,然本研究認為品牌價值係源自於其技術能力,而技術能力源自於人才與組織制度和文化,其中組織制度與文化更為重要,其具有連結、整合、建構所有資源的能力,創造異質性,進而發展公司的核心競爭力,而組織資源的重要性亦源於其能夠維持核心資源的優勢特性,維持或提升市場的競爭優勢,儘管資源特性會受到內外部環境影響而變化,組織資源能有足夠彈性與應對能力應對之,尤其在現今這個易動的社會。
而組織制度與文化是由「人」訂定之、實行之,因而某種程度上亦會受到組織關鍵人物之背景影響,例如,個案公司之日本文化,實事求是的精神。
By reviewing resources-based related literatures and using case study method to explore that how the case company can make the success base on the resource-based theory.
This studys find that the current definition of the core resource and core competence, whether academic or practical, has a "fuzzy" phenomenon, perhaps because the two are similar in nature, or because the core competence is mainly caused by a certain core resource. And the reason that core competence could be a core competence is because of the complex of the process of constructing a resource, a core resource, or a core competence. And this study believes that brand value is derived from firm’s technical capability which is derived from talents and organizations culture, which shows the importance of the organizational resource, and the importance is also because it has the ability to protect the advantages of resources.
一、 中文文獻
1. 石耀麟. (2009). 以資源基礎理論探討國內 3C 通路賣場之競爭優勢及經營策略.
2. 吳先智. (1981). 譯本汽車輪胎知識與特性. 建宏出版社.
3. 呂典育. (2017). 臺灣輪胎產業經營效率分析–資料包絡分析法應用.
4. 李家帆. (2014). 在資源基礎理論下衡量企業軟實力-以全球主要智慧型手機品牌為例. 交通大學企業管理碩士學程學位論文, 1-32.
5. 林晉寬. (1995). 從資源基礎理論探討資源特性與成長策略之關係. 博士論文. 國立政治大學企業管理研究所.
6. 邱麗卿. (2010). 台灣輪胎公司發展成功因素之研究--以正新集團為例.
7. 邱顯貴 & 楊亨利. (2003). 知識資本蓄積及價值創造:以學習和關系網路理論為基礎. 資訊社會研究, 4, 19-52.
8. 統一投顧. (2014). 橡膠及輪胎產業.
9. 莊尚平. (2001). 資源基礎理論下持久競爭優勢之整合性架構初探.
10. 許憲揚. (2014). 以資源基礎理論探討車輛製造商之製造策略. 清華大學工業工程與工程管理學系工程碩士在職專班學位論文, 1-119.
11. 陳列全. (2013). 以資源基礎理論 探討半導體產業的整合趨勢. 清華大學高階主管經營管理碩士在職專班學位論文, 1-73.
12. 陳俊賢. (2006). 應用資源基礎論分析經營策略: 以某外商輪胎公司為例.
13. 陳家倫. (2012). 台灣輪胎產業經營績效之研究. 臺灣大學經濟學研究所學位論文, 1-43.
14. 程鍾陽. (2011). 以資源基礎理論探討液晶平面顯示器個案企業之營運規劃. 博士論文. 國立清華大學.
15. 黃樑傑. (2009). 國內輪胎產業現況分析. 財團法人車輛研究中心.
16. 黃馨儀. (2016). 台灣汽車輪胎產業競爭策略之研究-以 T 公司為例. 健行科技大學國際企業經營系碩士在職專班學位論文, 1-65.
17. 楊耀信. (2010). 橡膠輪胎業供應鏈管理模式之研究.
18. 歐陽洪利. (2011). 我國輪胎行業面臨成本推進型的新挑戰.
19. 橫笛. (2012). 全球輪胎企業研發經費普增. 橡膠科技市場, 10(4), 20-20.
20. 賴威民. (2015). Lotka-Volterra 模型於台灣輪胎製造產業營收之應用分析. 交通大學管理學院管理科學學程學位論文, 1-56.
21. 戴國良. (2001). 台灣服務業優勢領導廠商關鍵成功因素之探索: 以資源基礎理論與知識經濟為觀點. 國立臺灣大學商學研究所.
22. 蘇俊叡. (2012). 探討體制環境, 資源和社會網絡對創新之影響: 台灣製茶業者之個案研究.博士論文. 屏東大學企業電子化研究所.
二、 英文文獻
1. Adner, R. (2006). Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem. Harvard business review, 84(4), 98.
2. Ahmad, S., & Schroeder, R. G. (2011). Knowledge management through technology strategy: implications for competitiveness. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 22(1), 6-24.
3. Alan V. Deardorff. (2006). Economic rent. Deardorff's Glossary of International Economics.
4. Alan V. Deardorff. (2006). Excess profit. Deardorff's Glossary of International Economics.
5. Alfina, K. N., Dachyar, M., & Farizal, F. (2018). Optimization Supply Chain Strategy of Tire Manufacturing Using Goal Programming Method. Paper presented at the International Conference On Multidisciplinary Academic (ICMA).
6. Amahalu, N. N., Agbionu, C. U., & Chinyere, O. J. (2017). Effect of human resource accounting on profitability of selected quoted telecommunication firms in Nigeria.
7. Bardia. (2005). Attractiveness of the Global Tire Industry.
8. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management, 17(1), 99-120.
9. Basnayake, C., & Rupasinghe, T. (2017). Dynamic Resource Planning and Scheduling Modelling Approach: A Case from a Tyre Manufacturing Company.
10. Beechler, S., & Yang, J. Z. (1994). The transfer of Japanese-style management to American subsidiaries: Constraints, and competencies. Journal of International Business Studies, 25(3), 467-491.
11. Bhardwaj, D., Das, D. R., Krishnan, M., & Singh, S. (2012). Cutting Edge Research: To Build Predictive Price‐Volume Model Quantitative Research & Analytics (with an example of Indian Tyre Industry). Metamorphosis, 11(1), 52-63.
12. Chang, S. J. (1995). International expansion strategy of Japanese firms: Capability building through sequential entry. Academy of Management journal, 38(2), 383-407.
13. Darayi, M., Eskandari, H., & Geiger, C. D. (2013). Using simulation-based optimization to improve performance at a tire manufacturing company. QScience Connect, 13.
14. Dick, J. S., & Rader, C. P. (2014). Raw Materials Supply Chain for Rubber Products. Raw Materials Supply Chain for Rubber Products, pages I XVI. Hanser.
15. Drobysheva, A. (2017). Word of Mouth as a marketing tool: Case study: Green tyre company.
16. FIORE, A. (2017). Sales and operations planning process: Bridgestone case study.
17. Gale, B. T., & Klavans, R. (1985). Formulating a quality improvement strategy. Journal of business strategy, 5(3), 21-32.
18. Grant, R. M. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation. California management review, 33(3), 114-135.
19. Guelle F. (2002). The Tire Industry: A Comparative Study About the Strategy of Internationalization of French and Japanese Multinationals. In: Horaguchi H., Shimokawa K. (eds) Japanese Foreign Direct Investment and the East Asian Industrial System. Springer, Tokyo
20. Gupta, V., Acharya, P., & Patwardhan, M. (2013). A strategic and operational approach to assess the lean performance in radial tyre manufacturing in India: a case based study. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 62(6), 634-651.
21. Hennart, J.-F., & Park, Y.-R. (1993). Greenfield vs. acquisition: The strategy of Japanese investors in the United States. Management science, 39(9), 1054-1070.
22. Ito, K., & Rose, E. L. (2002). Foreign direct investment location strategies in the tire industry. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(3), 593-602.
23. Jayachandran, S., Gimeno, J., & Varadarajan, P. R. (1999). The theory of multimarket competition: A synthesis and implications for marketing strategy. The Journal of Marketing, 49-66.
24. Kalnicki, F. A., & Ponton, B. T. (2010). Tire market forecasting method: Google Patents.
25. Khiev, C. (2009). National Updates on Agribusiness Large Scale Land Acquisitions in Southeast Asia Brief# 6 of 8: Kingdom of Cambodia.
26. Malhotra, T., & Berger, P. D. (2016). Marketing Strategy and Innovation at Michelin. British Journal of Marketing Studies, 4(5), 63-73.
27. MOHAMED, F. A. (2016). OPERATIONS STRATEGY AND SUSTAINABLE COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE IN TYRE INDUSTRY IN NAIROBI COUNTY, KENYA (Doctoral dissertation, SCHOOL OF BUSINESS, UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI).
28. Mudambi, R., Mudambi, S. M., Mukherjee, D., & Scalera, V. G. (2017). Global connectivity and the evolution of industrial clusters: From tires to polymers in Northeast Ohio. Industrial Marketing Management, 61, 20-29.
29. Nobeoka, K., & Cusumano, M. A. (1997). Multiproject strategy and sales growth: the benefits of rapid design transfer in new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 18(3), 169-186.
30. Nowicka-Skowron, M., & Stegăroiu, I. (2015). Strategies Used to Improve Industrial Companies' Production Quality Systemic Approaches to Strategic Management: Examples from the Automotive Industry (pp. 298-327): IGI Global.
31. Parthasarathy, S., Momaya, K. S., & Jha, S. K. (2016). Internationalization of Indian Firms: An Exploratory Study of Two Firms from the Tyre Industry. Journal of East-West Business, 22(4), 324-350.
32. Peled, J. (2015). Future tyre production: principles and methods. International Polymer Science and Technology, 42(10), T29.
33. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (2006). The core competence of the corporation. In Strategische unternehmungsplanung—strategische unternehmungsführung (pp. 275-292). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
34. Sull, D. N. (1999). The dynamics of standing still: Firestone Tire & Rubber and the radial revolution. Business history review, 73(3), 430-464.
35. Tuna, S. (2016). Organized knowledge integration: process studies on new product development (Doctoral dissertation, ETH Zurich).
36. Uellendahl, J. (2002). Secured Distribution as an Element in the Sales Strategy based on the Example of Goodyear Dunlop in the European Union Strategic Management (pp. 201-219): Springer.
37. Vishnevskiy, K. O., Linton, J. D., & Egorova, O. G. (2016). Integration of TRM and QFD for Sectoral Foresight: Russian Experience. Paper presented at the ISPIM Conference Proceedings.
38. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource‐based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180.
39. YE Ke-shu. (2001). New Improvement on The World Tire Technology.
40. Yu Qingxi, Zheng Yusheng. (2008). The technological progress of tire industry.
41. Yu Qingxi. (2010). Development strategy of modern tire enterprises in the world.
三、 網路文獻
1. Brand Finance: http://brandirectory.com/league_tables/table/tyres-10-2018
2. Tyrepress :https://www.tyrepress.com/
3. Tire business:https://www.tirebusiness.com/
4. 普利司通官網:https://www.bridgestone.com/regional/asia_pacific/