簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 李榮輔
Rong-Fu Lee
論文名稱: 臺華窯-窯身一變的創新商機
TAI HWA POTTERY- Changing Kiln Opens Up New Business Opportunities
指導教授: 歐陽超
Chao Ou-Yang
口試委員: 歐陽超
郭人介
葉瑞徽
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 工業管理系
Department of Industrial Management
論文出版年: 2023
畢業學年度: 112
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 58
中文關鍵詞: 創業精神資源拼湊異業結盟價值共創商業模式
外文關鍵詞: Entrepreneurship, Resource bricolage, Cross-industry alliance, Value co-creation, Business model
相關次數: 點閱:52下載:6
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本個案中的主角呂兆炘董事長憑藉著對陶瓷產業市場的敏銳度和觀察,發現了傳統產業受到外在環境的強烈竸爭下必須做企業轉型,尤其是在1989年鶯歌陶瓷產業加速外移而逐漸沒落,企業只能快速的應變和積極尋找新市場。
    「精彩藝術工作室」成立於1988年,其展現積極的創新,並開始研究釉彩新製程及釉藥開發,解決色料表現與燒製上的問題。1995年該工作室成立了「陶藝研習中心」,並邀請畫家加入研創室,探索彩瓷的多元運用。1999年又設立了「臺華窯藝術中心」,將藝術思維融入工藝市場,豐富彩瓷工藝的多元性。該工作室秉持勇於開創才能突破現況;不斷創造才能無畏模仿的信念,展現出卓越的藝術水準與市場競爭力。
    在開放窯場後,直接接觸消費者,掌握市場的脈動,並及時地與不同領域的夥伴合作,共同打造雙贏的局面、豐富陶瓷產品的多樣性,同時建立自有門市與加盟店,進入零售業市場,為產業帶來新的活力。
    呂兆炘是一位以創新為理念的董事長,他帶領企業進行變革與轉型,並與不同領域的合作夥伴、消費者、藝術專家和陶瓷業者共同創造價值。本論文將以採用哈佛的個案研究方法,分析個案的主角如何運用其創業家特質,在企業面對挑戰的過程中克服困難,並在資源有限的情況下,提高組織效能。


    In this case, the protagonist, Chairman Lu Zhaoxun, with his keen understanding and observation of the ceramic industry market, discovered that traditional industries must undergo business transformation due to intense competition from the external environment. Especially in the 1980s, when the Yingge ceramic industry accelerated its relocation and gradually declined, businesses could only respond quickly and actively seek new markets.
    Since 1988, the establishment of the “Brilliant Art Studio” has demonstrated active innovation, and began to research new glaze processes and glaze development, solving problems in pigment performance and firing. In 1995, the studio established the “Ceramic Art Study Center” and invited painters to join the research and creation room to explore the diverse use of colored porcelain. In 1999, it established the “Taihua Kiln Art Center”, integrating artistic thinking into the craft market, and enriching the diversity of colored porcelain craft culture. The studio adheres to the belief that one must be brave to innovate in order to break through the current situation; continuous creation can be fearless of imitation, demonstrating excellent artistic standards and market competitiveness.
    After opening the kiln site, they directly interacted with consumers, grasped the pulse of the market, and cooperated with partners in different fields in a timely manner to create a win-win situation and enrich the diversity of ceramic products. At the same time, they established their own retail stores and franchise stores, entered the retail market, and brought new vitality to the industry.
    Lu Zhaoxun is an innovation-led chairman who leads the company in transformation and change, and co-creates value with partners in different fields, consumers, art experts, and ceramic industry operators. This paper will use the Harvard case study method to analyze how the protagonist of the case uses his entrepreneurial traits to overcome difficulties in the process of the company facing challenges, and improve organizational efficiency under limited resources.

    摘要 ..................................................... I ABSTRACT ................................................. II 誌謝 ..................................................... III 目錄 ..................................................... IV 圖目錄 ................................................... VI 表目錄 ................................................... VII 第 1 章 個案本文 ......................................... 1 1.1 序曲 ................................................. 1 1.2 鶯歌陶瓷產業發展狀況 ................................. 1 1.2.1 鶯歌陶瓷的發展與歷程 ............................... 1 1.2.2 鶯歌產業人口與工廠數量之變化 ....................... 3 1.3 產業轉型的改革之路 ................................... 6 1.3.1 成立初期的公司營運模式 ............................. 6 1.3.2 企業面對之轉機與挑戰 ............................... 8 1.3.3 核心能力向下扎根 ................................... 10 1.3.4 開放胸襟打開多元市場 ............................... 13 1.3.5 工藝與藝術碰撞以提昇彩瓷價值 ....................... 15 1.3.6 與不同產業之策略合作 ............................... 18 1.3.7 深值在地文化底蘊發展 ............................... 20 1.3.8 在地產業結合推往永續發展 ........................... 22 1.4 課前的問題討論 ....................................... 29 第 2 章 教學指引 ......................................... 30 2.1 個案的總覽 ........................................... 30 2.2 個案的層次 ........................................... 31 2.3 教學目標 ............................................. 34 2.3.1 教學目標一:創業精神之探討 ......................... 34 2.3.2 教學目標二:資源拼湊之探討 ......................... 38 2.3.3 教學目標三:異業結盟之探討 ......................... 41 2.3.4 教學目標四:價值共創之探討 ......................... 45 2.3.5 教學目標五:商業模式之探討 ......................... 49 2.4教學建議 .............................................. 53 2.5板書規劃 .............................................. 54 參考文獻 ................................................. 55 附錄 ..................................................... 58

    李幸芳(2003),鶯歌鎮陶瓷產業對都市空間發展型態變遷之研究,國立臺北科技大學建築與都市設計研究所碩士論文,臺北市。
    林郁琅(2009),文化政策對城鄉再發展影響之研究—以台北縣鶯歌鎮為例,中國文化大學巿政暨環境規劃學系碩士論文,臺北市。
    林萬益(2013)服務與技術的整合:資騰科技。
    徐茂練(2007)。企業家之特質與認知,2007創業教育學術研討會。
    傅茹璋(2007),地方文化產業與城鄉發展之研究—以台北縣鶯歌鎮為例,《2007環境規劃與城鄉研究研討會》,第20-21頁。
    黃志忠(2011),影響異業結盟之關鍵因素探討-行銷績效觀點,國立雲林科技大學商管專業學院碩士論文,雲林縣。
    臺華瓷之美型錄(1990)。
    臺華藝集32(2021),淬鍊、精彩—臺華窯四十大事記。
    臺華藝集38(2023),從設計看故事(上)。
    臺華藝集39(2023),從設計看故事(下)。
    劉常通(2004)創業管理的十二堂課。臺北市:天下雜誌出版公司。
    劉鎧(2009),航空產業異業結盟共同行銷之策略探討:以長榮航空與HelloKitty合作案為例,國立臺灣大學國際企業管理碩士論文,臺北市。
    謝如梅、莊為傑、方世杰(2011)。資源拼湊、創業經驗與新事業機會之初探性研究:社會網絡觀點。第14屆科技整合管理研討會。
    顧淑馨(2004)。消費者王朝:與顧客共創價值(原文作者:C.K. Prahalad、Venkat Ramaswamy)。台北:天下雜誌。
    鶯歌產地開放日散步護照(2023)。
    Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation: a handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers (Vol. 1). John Wiley & Sons.
    Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E. (2005). Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 329-366.
    Baker, T., Miner, A. S., & Eesley, D. T. (2003). Improvising firms: Bricolage, account giving and improvisational competencies in the founding process. Research Policy, 32(2), 255-276.
    Bannock, G. , Davis, E , Trott, P. and Uncles, M. (2003), Dictionary of Business, 1st ed.,London:Economist Books.
    Drucker, P. (1985). Entrepreneurship and innovation: Practice and principles. NY: Harper Business. Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of management review, 23(4), 660-679.
    Hult G. Tomas M., and Ketchen David J. Jr. (2001), “Does Market Orientation Matter? A Test of the Relationship Between Positional Advantage and Performance,” Strategic Management Journal, 22 (9), 899–906.
    Levi-Strauss, C. (1966). The savage mind(La pensee suavage). London: Weidenfeld & Niolson. Peng, M. W., Wang, D. Y., & Jiang, Y. (2008). An institution-based view of international business strategy: A focus on emerging economies. Journal of international business studies, 39, 920-936.
    Prahalad, C.K. and Ramaswamy, V. (2004) The Future of Competition Co-Creating Unique Value with Customers. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
    Ramirez, R.(1999), Value co-production: intellectual origins and implications for practice and research. Strategic Management Journal, 20(1), 49-65.
    Schumpeter, J. A., (1934), The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest and the Business Cycle, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. Translated from the German by Redvers Opie.
    Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory. McGraw-Hill..

    QR CODE