一般而言，有得到政府贊助之研究成果，當需要向美國專利局（USPTO）提交專利申請時，大部分的狀況下會在專利文件上，標記有「政府贊助」之計劃編號。如此「政府贊助」之專利常涉及美國政府投資大量金額科學與技術發展。獲得政府贊助的研究，往往不僅僅可以發表學術論文，更可以透過申請專利擁有智慧財產權。於學術界，越來越多的科學家選擇了這種雙重知識公開的路徑，亦即連接揭露共同基礎知識之科學文章與專利的專利–論文配對(Patent-Paper pair)。於學術引用方面，擁有專利配對的論文比起沒有專利配對的論文，具有明顯較高的被引用率，這說明專利–論文配對於技術研發中尤其具有價值。
本研究提出一依據政府贊助資訊建立專利–論文配對之方法。首先，從論文資料庫裡找出獲得政府贊助的知名學者。接著，從專利資料庫確認該知名學者擁有專利後，進一步從該知名學者之專利找出相對應的論文。透過比對是否擁有相同作者或發明人、政府贊助編號以及重要技術特徵，由此確認該知名學者之專利–論文配對。最後，分析結果亦驗證了本論文所提出之依據政府贊助資訊建立專利–論文配對方法之可行性。

Generally speaking, if there is a government-funded patent, when it is submitted to the United States Patent Office (USPTO), it will be marked with 「Government Interest」 in most cases. Such "government interest" patents often involve a great amount of capital invested by US government in scientific and technological development. The results of government-funded research can often not only publish academic papers, but also formally own intellectual property rights through patent applications. More and more scientists have chosen the dual-path knowledge disclosure, i.e. the patent-paper pair which links scientific articles and patents disclosing the same basic knowledge. The paper with matched patent(s) have a significantly higher citation rate than the papers without matched patent(s), which shows that patent-paper pairs are particularly valuable in scientific technology research and development.
This research proposes a method for finding and establishing patent-paper pairs based on 「Government Interest」 information. At first, we try to find well-known scholars receiving government funds from the digital library of academic papers. Then, we have to confirm whether the well-known scholar has patents through the patent database. After confirmation, if the well-known scholar has one (or more) patent(s), the corresponding paper will be further found from the well-known scholar’s patent. By comparing whether they have the same author (or inventor), government funding number and core technology concept, the patent-paper pairs can be established. Finally, the analysis results also verify the feasibility of the proposed method for establishing the patent-paper pairs based on 「Government Interest」 information.

中文部分
杜俊寬(2017)。政府贊助大學研發成果專利權歸屬之探討-以大學與教師之關係為中心。國立臺灣科技大學專利研究所碩士論文。
國家實驗研究院科技政策研究與資訊中心(2005)。政府補助計畫所衍生之專利。Retrieved from https://iknow.stpi.narl.org.tw/post/Read.aspx?PostID=3453
維基百科。IEEE Xplore。Retrieved from https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_Xplore
維基百科。國家科學基金會。Retrieved from
https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%9B%BD%E5%AE%B6%E7%A7%91%E5%AD%A6%E5%9F%BA%E9%87%91%E4%BC%9A
維基百科。公正網。Retrieved from
https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%85%AC%E6%AD%A3%E7%BD%91
 
英文部分
American Institutes for Research (2016). Patentsview: government interest processing. Technical Report.
Ducor, P. (2000). Intellectual property - Coauthorship and coinventorship. Science 289(5481), 873-875.
Huang, K. G., & Murray, F. E. (2009). Does patent strategy shape the long-run supply of public knowledge? evidence from humangenetics. Academy of Management Journal 52(6), 1193-1221.
Huang, K. G. (2017). Uncertain intellectual property conditions and knowledge appropriation strategies: Evidence from the genomics industry. Industrial and Corporate Change 26(1), 41–71.
Long, G. (2019). Federal government-interest patent disclosures for recent top-selling drugs. Journal of Medical Economics 22(11), 1261-1267.
Loise, V., Stevens, A.J. (2012). The Bayh-Dole Act turns 30. Science Translational Medicine 2(52),185-194.
Magerman, T., Van Looy, B., & Debackere, K. (2011). In search of anti-commons: patent paper pairs in biotechnology. An analysis of citation flows.
Mansfield, E. (1991). Academic research and industrial innovation. Research Policy 20(1), 1-12.
Murray, F. (2002). Innovation as overlapping scientific and technological trajectories: exploring tissue engineering. Research Policy 31(8-9), 1389-1403.
Murray, F., & Stern, S. (2007). Do formal intellectual property rights hinder the free flow of scientific knowledge?: An empirical test of the anti-commons hypothesis. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 63(4), 648-687.
Montalvo J. A. (2005). Government Interest in US Patents: Classifications most often cited.
Narin, F., Hamilton, K., & Olivastro, D. (1997). The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science. Research Policy 26(3), 317-330.
Rai A., & Sampat, B. (2012). Accountability in patenting of federally funded research. Nat Biotechnol 30(10), 953–956.
Solow, R. M. (1957). Technical Change and the aggregate production function. The Review of Economics and Statistics 39(3), 312-320.