產業聚落係上下游產業鏈為了提升生產效率，聚集在同一區域或地方，從事相關或互補的行為。一個產業聚落的形成，會帶來大量的工作機會，與經濟的成長。產業聚落地區的選擇必須考慮多個面向，包含人力，土地，交通等等因素，而這些因素也會隨著經濟的成長而有所改變。此時，產業聚落也將臨調整或遷移。本研究透過次級資料的收集，包含政府公告資料，及個案公司所發布之訊息，進行分析。個案公司(惠普)帶領電子產業聚落遷移時所需要思考的因素、為何需要遷移、為何選擇重慶為最終方案，以及在選擇重慶為新的聚落地點後，惠普與供應商即將面臨哪些困難。產業聚落的遷移是需要時間，以及上下游的供應商的配合，然而過往遷移都等到投資環境已經改變，開始侵蝕毛利時才被動地尋找下一個地點，在面臨獲利下降的強大壓力之下，較難完成完整的評估，將會讓公司面臨相當程度的風險。因此，如果能將被動遷移轉換成主動出擊，將有利於公司未來的規劃、營運與資金流動。

In order to improve production efficiency, industrial clusters are concentrated in the same region or place to engage in related or complementary activities. The formation of an industrial settlement will bring a lot of job opportunities and economic growth. The choice of industrial settlements must consider multiple aspects, including manpower, land, transportation, etc., and these factors will also change as the economy grows. At this point, industrial settlements will also be adjusted or migrated. This study analyzes the collection of secondary data, including government announcements and information published by case companies. The factors that need to be considered when the case company (HP) leads the electronics industry settlement, why it needs to be migrated, why Chongqing is the final solution, and what difficulties HP and suppliers will face after choosing Chongqing as a new settlement. The migration of industrial settlements takes time and the cooperation of upstream and downstream suppliers. However, the past migrations have waited until the investment environment has changed. When it begins to erode gross profit, it is passively looking for the next place. Under the strong pressure of falling profits, It is more difficult to complete a complete assessment and will expose the company to a considerable degree of risk. Therefore, if we can convert passive migration into active attack, it will be beneficial to the company's future planning, operation and capital flow.

王緝慈(2001)，創新的空間－企業集群與區域發展，北京：北京大學。
李明軒，邱如美(譯)，1996。Porter,M.E著。國家競爭優勢。【The competitive Advantage of Nations】。台北：天下文化。(1990)。
高登第，李明軒(譯)(2001)。Porter,M.E著。競爭理論[On Competition]台北：天下遠見。(1998)
張陽隆(2001)，產業群聚之成因，廠商行為與組織績效之關聯性研究－以台灣高科技產業為例，成大企管所碩士論文。
Anderson, G. (1994), “Industry Clustering for Economic Development, Economic Development Review,” Vol.12, Iss.2,pp.26-32.
Czamanski, S. & Ablas, L.A.(1979), “Identification of Industrial Cluster and Complexes: A Comparison of Methods and Findings,” Urban Studies,16,61-80.
Feser,E.J. & Bergmans, E.M.(2000), “National Industry Cluster Templates: A Framework for Applied Regional Cluster Analysis,” Regional Studies,34.1.
Hill, C. W .L. and Jones, G.R. (2004), “Strategic management theory,” New York: Houghton Miffin Company.
Nadvi, K (1999), “Collective Efficiency and Collective Failure: The Response of the Sialkot Surgical Instrument Cluster to Global Quality Pressure,” Word Development,Vol.27,No.9,pp.1605-1626.
Porter, M. E. (1998), “Cluster and the new Economics of Competition,” Harvard Business Review, Nov.~Dec.,pp77-90.
Porter, M. E.(1990), “The Competitive Advantage of Nations,” New York: Free Press.
Stuart, T. E (2000), “Inter-organizational alliances and performance of firm: a study of growth and innovation rates in high-technology industry,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol.21(8),pp.791-811.
Weber, A. (1929), A “Theory of the Location of Industries,” J. Friendrich, Chicago University Press.