帳號:guest(3.227.0.150)          離開系統
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  

詳目顯示

以作者查詢圖書館館藏以作者查詢臺灣博碩士論文系統以作者查詢全國書目勘誤回報
作者姓名(中文):范凱雯
作者姓名(英文):HOI-MAN FAN
論文名稱(中文):以多層次觀點探討學習型組織與單位績效之關係-以 動態創業能力為中介變項、環境競爭性為調節變項
論文名稱(外文):A Multilevel Examination of Learning Organization and Unit Performance: the Mediating Effect of Dynamic Entrepreneurial Capabilities and the Morderating Effect of Environmental Competitiveness
指導教授姓名(中文):張譯尹
指導教授姓名(英文):Yi-Ying Chang
口試委員姓名(中文):吳宗祐
陳崇文
曾盛恕
口試委員姓名(英文):Tsung-Yu Wu
Chung-Wen Chen
Seng-Su Tsang
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺灣科技大學
系所名稱:企業管理系
學號:M10508001
出版年(民國):108
畢業學年度:107
學期:2
語文別:中文
論文頁數:70
中文關鍵詞:動態能力理論學習型組織動態創業能力環境競爭性單位績效
外文關鍵詞:Dynamic Capability TheoryLearning OrganizationDynamic Entrepreneurial CapabilityEnvironmental CompetitivenessUnit Performance
相關次數:
  • 推薦推薦:0
  • 點閱點閱:36
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏收藏:0
在訊息爆炸、電子商務崛起的時代,商業環境以前所未有的速度在變動,許 多企業為了求存紛紛追求創新及轉型,並藉由創新來維持同業間的競爭優勢,因 此,動態能力(Dynamic capability)的概念逐漸受到關注。過往學者的研究著重探 討企業動態創業能力(Dynamic Entrepreneurial capability)與單位績效(Unit Performance)間的正向關係,卻忽略了造成此正向關係的原因,因此本研究從動 態能力觀點出發,探討學習型組織對動態創業能力與單位績效的影響及其調節機 制。本研究的研究對象為 72 位高階管理者、144 位管理者、288 位員工,分別隸 屬於 72 個單位及 36 間公司。採用 Mplus7.4 進行跨層次分析,研究結果顯示學 習型組織是造成動態創業能力及正向單位績效的原因;而環境競爭性未能調節學 習型組織和單位績效之間的關係。
It is an indisputable fact that technology has brought significant changes to business environment. Only by innovating and transforming can an enterprise survive, thus, Dynamic Capability Theory is becoming more popular. Besides, there have been so many scholars discussed about the positive relationship between Dynamic Entrepreneurial Capability and Unit Performance. However, the reason for this positive relationship was neglected. This study attempts to open the black box of Dynamic Entrepreneurial Capability and Unit Performance relationship by analyzing how a firm constructed Learning Organization from the Dynamic Capability perspective. The Learning Organization, Dynamic Entrepreneurial Capability and Unit Performance partially mediate effect and moderate effect of Environmental Competitiveness were discussed. Multilevel data from 288 employees, 144 managers and 72 top managers of firms in China and Taiwan was collected. Results revealed that Dynamic Entrepreneurial Capability partially mediate the relationship between Learning Organization and unit performance. Nevertheless, both moderate effects of Environmental Competitiveness were not supported.
摘要 ........................................................................................................................... I Abstract.....................................................................................................................II
目錄 ........................................................................................................................ III
圖表目錄 ..................................................................................................................V
第一章 緒論............................................................................................................. 1
第一節 研究背景與動機................................................................................ 1
第二章 文獻探討..................................................................................................... 3
第一節 理論基礎 ........................................................................................... 3
第二節 學習型組織 ....................................................................................... 5
第三節 動態創業能力.................................................................................... 9
第四節 單位績效 ......................................................................................... 11
第五節 環境競爭性 ..................................................................................... 12
第六節 學習型組織、動態創業能力與單位績效之關係............................ 13
第七節 環境競爭性之調節關係 .................................................................. 15
第八節 研究架構與假說.............................................................................. 17
第三章 研究方法................................................................................................... 18
第一節 研究設計與研究對象 ...................................................................... 18
第二節 研究工具與測量方法 ...................................................................... 20
第三節 資料分析方法.................................................................................. 24
第四章 研究結果................................................................................................... 27
第一節 描述性統計分析 ............................................................................ 27
第二節 相關分析 ......................................................................................... 30
第三節 資料分析(ICC1,ICC2,Rwg(j)).......................................................... 32
第四節 跨層次分析與檢驗假說 .................................................................. 34
第五章 結論........................................................................................................... 41
第一節 研究結果與討論.............................................................................. 41
第二節 學術意涵與管理意涵 ...................................................................... 43
第三節 研究限制與未來研究方向 .............................................................. 44
參考文獻 ................................................................................................................ 46
附錄:研究問卷..................................................................................................... 55
AhmadHazlinaNoor , & SeetPi-shen. (2009). Dissecting Behaviours Associated with Business Failure: A Qualitative Study of SME Owners in Malaysia and Australia. Asian Social Science, pp 98.
AwadElias M., & GhaziriHassan. (2010). Knowledge Management. Prentice Hall. Bierly III Paul E., & DalyPaula S. . (2007). Alternative Knowledge Strategies,
Competitive Environment, and Organizational Performance in Small
Manufacturing Firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, pp 493-516. BirkinshawJulian, HoodNeil , & YoungStephen . (2005). Subsidiary entrepreneurship,
internal and external competitive forces, and subsidiary performance.
International Business Review, pp 227–248.
ByrneBarbara M. (1994). Structural Equation Modeling with EQS and
EQS/WINDOWS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. SAGE. CampbellTimothy T., & ArmstrongSteven J. (2013). A longitudinal study of
individual and organisational learning. The Learning Organization; Bradford,
pp 240-258.
CovinJG, GreenKM , & SlevinDP. (2006). Strategic Process Effects on the
Entrepreneurial Orientation–Sales Growth Rate Relationship.
Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, pp 57-81.
DillWilliam R. (1958). Environment as an Influence on Managerial Autonomy.
Administrative Science Quarterly, pp 409-443.
Hurley Robert F., & HultG. Tomas M. . (1998). Innovation, Market Orientation, and
Organizational Learning: An Integration and Empirical Examination. Journal
of Marketing, pp 42-54.
HusseinaNorashikin, MohamadbAmnah , NoordinFauziah, & Ishak AmirNoormala.
(2013). Learning Organization and its Effect on Organizational Performance and Organizational Innovativeness: A Proposed Framework for Malaysian Public Institutions of Higher Education. Social and Behavioral Sciences, pp 299 – 304.
Ireland R. Duane, Covin Jeffrey G., & Kura Donald F. (2009). Conceptualizing Corporate Entrepreneurship Strategy. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, pp 19-46.
JansenJustin J. P., Bosch Van DenFrans A. J., & VolberdaHenk W. . (2006). Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation, and Performance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators. Management Science, pp 1661-1674.
JansenJustin J. P., BoschFrans A. J. Van Den , & VolberdaHenk W. . (2006).
Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation, and Performance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators. Management science , pp 1661 - 1674.
JaworskiBernard J., & Kohli Ajay K. (1993). Market Orientation: Antecedents and Consequences. Journal of Marketing , pp 53-70.
Kohli Ajay K., & JaworskiBernard J. (1990). Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions, and Managerial Implications. Journal of Marketing , pp 1-18.
KumarV., Jones Eli, VenkatesanRajkumar , & LeoneRobert P. . (2011). Is Market Orientation a Source of Sustainable Competitive Advantage or Simply the Cost of Competing? Journal of Marketing, pp 16-30.
MilesMorgan P, & Arnold Danny R. (1991). The Relationship between Marketing Orientation and Entrepreneurial Orientation. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, pp 49-66.
O'BrienMichael J. (1994). Learning Organization Practices Profile. Pfeiffer. PorterE. Michael, & LindeClaas van der. (1995). Toward a New Conception of the
Environment-Competitiveness Relationship. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC
PERSPECTIVES, pp 97-118.
SerratOlivier. (2009). Building a Learning Organization. Asian Development Bank. TavakolMohsen, & DennickReg. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha.
International Journal of Medical Education.
TeeceDavid J. (2012). Dynamic Capabilities: Routines versus Entrepreneurial Action.
Journal of Management Studies.
AhmadN. H., WilsonC., & Kummerow L. (2011). Assessing the Dimensionality of
Business Success: The Perspectives of Malaysian SME Owner-Managers.
Journal of Asia-Pacific Business, pp 207-224.
Argyris Chris, & Schön Donald A. (1996). Organizational learning II: Theory, method
and practice. Addison‐Wesley.
ArmstrongA., & FoleyP. (2003). Foundations of a learning organization: Organization
learning mechanism. Learning Organization, pp 74-82.
AugierM., & TeeceD.J. (2009). Dynamic capabilities and the role of managers in
business strategy and economic performance. Organ Sci., pp 410–421. Baird Skromme Inga, & Thomas Howard . (1985). Toward a contingency model of
strategic risk taking. Academy of management Review.
Baker William E., & Sinkula James M. (2009). The Complementary Effects of Market
Orientation and Entrepreneurial Orientation on Profitability in Small
Businesses. Journal of small business management.
BakerWilliam E. , & SinkulaJames M. . (1999). Learning Orientation, Market
Orientation, and Innovation: Integrating and Extending Models of Organizational Performance. Journal of Market-Focused Management, pp 295–308.
Barney J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, pp 99-120.
Birkinshaw Julian , & HoodNeil. (1998). Multinational Subsidiary Evolution: Capability and Charter Change in Foreign-Owned Subsidiary Companies. Academy of Management Review, pp 773-795.
BirkinshawJulian , HoodNeil , & YoungStephen. (2005). Subsidiary entrepreneurship, internal and external competitive forces, and subsidiary performance. International Business Review, pp 227–248.
BliesePD . (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. (Eds.)J. Klein and S. W. J. KozlowskiK., Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations (pp 349-381). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
BrowneM.W., & CudeckR. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Bollen& Long, J.S.K.A., Testing structural equation models (pp 136–162). Newbury Park.
Calantone Roger J, CavusgiS.Tamer, & ZhaoYushan. (2002). Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance. Industrial Marketing Management, pp 515-524.
ChenG, & Bliese P. D. . (2002). The role of different levels of leadership in predicting self- and collective efficacy: Evidence for discontinuity. Journal of Applied Psychology, pp 549-556.
ChoiSuk Bong, & WilliamsChristopher. (2016). Entrepreneurial orientation and performance: mediating effects of technology and marketing action across industry types. Industry and Innovation, pp 673-693.
CooperCharles. (1971). Science, Technology and Development. Economic and Social Review.
Covin, J.G, & Slevin D.P. . (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, pp 75–87.
CovinJ.G., & SlevinD.P. (1991). A Conceptual Model of Entrepreneurship as Firm Behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, pp 5-28.
Curado Carla. (2006). Organisational learning and organisational design. The Learning Organization; Bradford, pp 24.
Dechezleprêtre Antoine, & SatoMisato . (2017). The Impacts of Environmental Regulations on Competitiveness. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, pp 183–206.
Easterby-SmithM., SnellR., & GherardiS. (1998). Organisational learning: diverging communities of practice? Management Learning, pp 259-272.
Eisenhardt K.M., & Martin J. (2000). Dynamic Capabilities: What Are They? Strategic Management Journal, pp 1105–1121.
Erbisch P. S. M. (2004). Management Style, Organizational Climate, and Organizational Performance in a Public Mental Health Agency: An Integral Model. Kalamazoo, Michigan.: Western Michigan University.
FloydS.W., & WooldridgeB. (1999). Knowledge creation and social networks in corporate entrepreneurship: The renewal of organizational capability. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, pp 123-143.
FrappaoloCarl . (2006). Knowledge Management. Capstone.
FriedmanV, LipshitzR, & PopperM. (2005). The mystification of organisational
learning. Journal of Management Inquiry, pp Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 19-30. Griffith Rachel , HuergoElena , Mairesse Jacques, & PetersBettina. (2006).
Innovation and Productivity Across Four European Countries. Oxford Review
of Economic Policy, pp 483–498.
HAMBRICKDONALD C., & MASONPHYLLIS A. (1984). Upper Echelons: The
Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers.
Hamel G., & PrahaladC. (1994). Competing for the Future. Boston: Harvard Business
School Press.
Helfat C. E., & Lieberman M. (2002). The Birth of Capabilities: Market Entry and the
Importance of Prehistory. Industrial and Corporate Change, pp 725–760. Helfat C. E., & Peteraf M. A. (2003). The Dynamic Resource Based View: Capability
Lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal, pp 997–1010.
HerreraDavid A. (2007). A validation of the learning organization as a driver of
performance improvement. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. KazanjianR. K., DrazinR., & GlynnM.A. (2001). Implementing strategies for corporate entrepreneurship: A knowledge-based perspective. Strategic
entrepreneurship: Creating a new mindset, pp 173–200.
KennyJohn. (2006). Strategy and the learning organization: a maturity model for the
formation of strategy. The Learning Organization, pp 353-368. KimKyoungshin, WatkinsKaren E., & LuZhenqiu (Laura). (2017). The impact of a
learning organization on performance: Focusing on knowledge performance and financial performance. European Journal of Training and Development; Limerick, pp 177-193.
KirznerI. (1997). Entrepreneurial Discovery and the Competitive Market Process: An Austrian Approach. Journal of Economic Literature, pp 60–85.
KozlowskiSteve W J , & HattrupKeith . (1992). A Disagreement About Within-Group
Agreement: Disentangling Issues of Consistency Versus Consensus. Journal of
Applied Psychology, pp 161-167.
KrausSascha , RigteringJ. P. Coen, HughesMathew, & HosmanVincent . (2012).
Entrepreneurial orientation and the business performance of SMEs: a quantitative study from the Netherlands. Review of Managerial Science, pp 161–182.
LanzaAndrea , & PassarelliMariacarmela . (2014). Technology Change and Dynamic Entrepreneurial Capabilities. Journal of Small Business Management, pp 427– 450.
Leone, Robert P; Jones, Eli; Venkatesan, Rajkumar; Kumar,, V;. (2011). Is Market Orientation a Source of Sustainable Competitive Advantage or Simply the Cost of Competing? Journal of Marketing; Chicago.
LiaoShu-hsien, & WuChi-chuan . (2009). The Relationship among Knowledge Management, Organizational Learning, and Organizational Performance. International Journal of Business and Management, pp 64.
Liu Sandra S, Luo Xueming, & Shi Yi-Zheng. (2002). Integrating customer orientation, corporate entrepreneurship, and learning orientation in organizations-in-transition: an empirical study. International Journal of Research in Marketing, pp 367-382.
LumpkinG T, & DessGregory G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management. The Academy of Management Review; Briarcliff Manor.
LumpkinG. T., & Dess G. G. (1996). Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking It to Performance. Academy of Management Review, pp 135-172.
ManvilleB. (2001). Learning in the new economy. Leader to Leader, pp 36-45. MarquardtM. J. (1996). Building the learning organization: A systems approach to
quantum improvement and global success. New York: McGraw‐Hill. MarquardtMichael. J. (1996). Building the learning organization: A systems approach
to quantum improvement and global success. New York: McGraw‐Hill. McNallyRegina C, Cavusgil Erin, & CalantoneRoge. (2010). Product Innovativeness
Dimensions and Their Relationships with Product Advantage, Product Financial Performance, and Project Protocol. The Journal of Product Innovation Management; Hoboken.
MeyerA. D. (1991). What is strategy's distinctive competence? Journal of Management, pp 821-833.
MilesMorgan , Covin Jeffrey G, & Heeley Michael. (2000). The relationship between environmental dynamism and small firm structure, strategy, and performance.
Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, pp 12.
MillerD. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurs in three types of firms. Management
Science, pp 770–791.
MoralesVíctor J. García, Montes Francisco J. Llorens, & JoverAntonio J. Verdú.
(2006). Antecedents and consequences of organizational innovation and organizational learning in entrepreneurship. Industrial Management & Data Systems, pp 21-42.
NonakaIkujiro . (2008). The Knowledge-creating Company. Tokyo: Harvard Business Press.
ParkBabette, Plass Jan L., & BrünkenRoland. (2014). Cognitive and affective processes in multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, pp 125-127.
PedlerMike , BurgoyneJohn , & BoydellTom . (1992). The Learning Company: a Strategy for Sustainable Development. RSA Journal.
Podsakoff Philip M, MacKenzie Scott B., LeeJeong-Yeon, & Podsakoff Nathan P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, pp 879.
PorterEM. (1980). Industry structure and competitive strategy: Keys to profitability. Financial Analysts Journal , pp 30-41.
PowerJ., & WaddellD. (2004). The link between self‐managed work teams and learning organisations using performance indicators. The Learning Organization, pp 244-259.
PriemRichard L., & ButlerJohn E. (2001). Is the resource-based view a useful perspective for strategic management research? Academy of Management Review, pp 22-40.
RauchA, WiklundJ., Frese M., & LumpkinT. G. (2004). Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance: Cumulative empirical evidence. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, pp 164-177 .
RaudysSJ, & Jain AK. (1991). Small sample size effects in statistical pattern recognition: Recommendations for practitioners. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence.
RevansR. (1983). The ABCs of action learning. Bromley, England: Chartwell Brat. Richard P.J, Devinney T.M, Yip G.S., & JohnsonG. (2009). Measuring organizational
performance: towards methodological best practice. Journal of Management,
pp 718-804.
Rowley Jennifer. (1998). Creating a learning organisation in higher education.
Industrial and Commercial Training; Guilsborough, pp 16-19. RowleyJennifer. (1998). Creating a learning organisation in higher education.
Industrial and Commercial Training, pp 16-19.
RumeltR. P. (2011). Good Strategy, Bad Strategy: The Difference and Why it Matters. New York: Crown Business.
Sambrook Sally , & RobertsClair. (2005). Corporate entrepreneurship and organizational learning: a review of the literature and the development of a conceptual framework. Strategic Change, pp 141–155.
SapienzaH. J., AutioE., GeorgeG., & Zahra S. A. (2006). A Capabilities Perspective on the Effects of Early Internationalization on Firm Survival and Growth. Academy of Management Review , pp 914–933.
SengeP. (1990). The fifth discipline. New York: Doubleday.
SeoYoung-Joon, Dinwoodie John, & Kwak Dong-Wook. (2014). The impact of
innovativeness on supply chain performance: is supply chain integration a
missing link? Supply Chain Management; Bradford, pp 733-746.
ShaneS., & VenkataramanS. (2000). The Promise of Entrepreneurship As A Field of
Study. Academy of Management Review, pp 217–226.
SharmaAstha, & DaveSuniita . (2011). Entrepreneurial Orientation: Performance
Level. SCMS Journal of Indian Management, pp 43-52.
SmithKen A, VasudevanSatish P, & Tanniru Mohan R. (1996). Organizational
learning and resource-based theory: an integrative model. Journal of
Organizational Change Management;Bradford, pp 41-53.
SoininenJ, PuumalainenKaisu , SjögrénHelena , & SyrjäPasi . (2011). The impact of
global economic crisis on SMEs: Does entrepreneurial orientation matter?
Management Research Review, pp 927-944.
SpectorPaul.E, & Brannick Michael T. (2010). Common Method Issues: An
Introduction to the Feature Topic in Organizational Research Methods.
Organizational Research Methods; Thousand Oaks.
StainerA. (1999). Productivity, performance and paradise. Management Services, pp
8-11.
StankardF.M. (2002). Management Systems and Organizational Performance: The
Search for Excellence Beyond ISO9000. . Westport, CT: Greenwood
Publishing Group.
SteinNeville . (2017). The learning organisation. Horticulture Week.
Teece D. J, PisanoG, & ShuenA. (1990). Firm capabilities, resources, and the concept
of strategy. Economic analysis and policy, pp 90-8.
Teece D. J. (2007). Explicating Dynamic Capabilities: The Nature and
Microfoundations of (Sustainable) Enterprise Performance. Strategic
Management Journal, pp 1319–1350.
TeeceD. J. (2010). Technological innovation and the theory of the firm: the role of
enterprise-level knowledge, complementarities, and (dynamic) capabilities.
Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, pp 679–730.
TeeceD. J, PisanoG., & Shuen A. (1997). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic
Management,. Strategic Management Journal, pp 509–534.
TeeceDavid J. (2016). Dynamic capabilities and entrepreneurial management in large
organizations: Toward a theory of the (entrepreneurial) firm.
EuropeanEconomicReview.
Tucker L.R, & LewisC. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood
factor analysis. Psychometrika.
TuppuraA., ToppinenA., & JantunenA. (2013). Proactiveness and Corporate Social
Performance in the Global Forest Industry. International Forestry Review, pp
112-121.
VenkatramanN., & RamanujamV. (1986). Measurement of business performance in
strategy research: A comparison of approaches. Academy of Management
Review, pp 801-814.
VolberdaH , & BruggenG Van. (1997). Environmental Turbulence: A look into its
Dimensionality.
WalesWilliam J., GuptaVishal K., & MousaFariss-Terry. (2011). Empirical research
on entrepreneurial orientation: An assessment and suggestions for future
research. International Small Business Journal , pp 1-27.
WatkinsK. E., & Marsick V. J. . (1993). Sculpting the Learning Organization: Lessons
in the Art and Science of Systemic Change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. WatkinsK. E., & Marsick V. J. (1999). Facilitating Learning Organizations: Making
Learning Count. Aldershot: Gower Publishing Limited.
Websters Merriam. (1991). Webster's Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary. U.S.A.:
Merriam-webster+ Inc.
Wiklund Johan, & Shepherd DEAN . (2003). Knowledge‐based resources,
entrepreneurial orientation, and the performance of small and medium‐sized
businesses. Strategic management journal, pp 1307-1314.
WiklundJ., & ShepherdD. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation and small business
performance: a configurational approach. Journal of Business Venturing, pp 71-91.
WinterS.G. (2003). Understanding Dynamic Capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, pp 991–995.
WoodStephen, Van VeldhovenMarc , CroonMarcel , & M de MenezesLilian. (2012).
Enriched job design, high involvement management and organizational performance: The mediating roles of job satisfaction and well-being. human relations.
Zahra S. A, & NielsenA. P. (2002). Sources of capabilities, integration and technology commercialization. Strategic Management Journal, pp 377–398.
Zahra S. A., & CovinJ. G. (1995). Zahra, S. A., & Covin Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship–performance relationship: A longitudinal analysis.
Journal of Business Venturing, pp 43–58.
ZoharD. (2000). A group-level model of safety climate: testing the effect of group
climate on microaccidents in manufacturing jobs. Journal of Applied
Psychology, pp 587-596.
邱皓政. (2017). 多層次模式與縱貫資料分析:Mplus 8 解析應用. 台灣: 五 南.
全文檔公開日期:2024/05/02 (本校及校內區域網路)
全文檔公開日期:不公開 (校外網際網路)
全文檔公開日期:不公開 (國家圖書館:臺灣博碩士論文系統)
電子全文
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top

相關論文

1. 探討單位層次的創業導向與單位績效間中介與調節機制-以學習型組織為中介變項、外在環境為調節變項
2. 探討多層次社會資本與單位績效間關係─以動態創業能力為中介變項、公司改善為調節變項
3. 以多層次觀點探討整合性思維與任務性績效間中介與調節機制–以動態能力為理論基礎
4. 以多層次觀點探討單位雙歧與任務績效之中介與調節機制–以動態能力為理論基礎
5. 威權領導、工作滿意與員工偏差行為之關係:自我效能的調節效果
6. 道德領導與員工建言行為研究 ─ 檢視工作敬業的中介效果與促進焦點的干擾角色
7. 倫理領導與員工建言行為之關連性研究-感受當責與信任主管之中介效果
8. 轉換型領導與公司績效:人力資本與組織雙歧之聯合中介效果
9. 轉換型領導對組織雙歧的影響—社會資本的中介機制及吸收能力的調節效果
10. 以多層次觀點探討高績效工作系統與經理人雙歧間中介機制-以共同語言與符號、吸收能力為跨層次中介變數
11. 高績效工作系統與經理人雙歧之關係─以多層次分析探討網絡關係、信任之中介影響
12. 高績效工作系統與經理人雙歧之跨層次關係-以網絡關係、共通語言與符號為中介變數
13. 以多層次觀點探討轉換型領導與企業家精神間中介機制-以賦權氣候、心理賦權為跨層次中介變項
14. 以資料包絡分析法評估區域性營業單位之營運績效-以空調產業為例
15. 以多層次觀點探討轉換型領導與組織雙歧之關係─企業家精神的中介機制與社會氣候的調節效果
 
* *