研究生: |
林序丞 Hsu-Cheng Lin |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
探討線性馬達之技術軌跡與全球專利佈局 Explore Development Trajectory and Global Patent Portfolio of Linear Motor Technology |
指導教授: |
何秀青
Mei HC Ho |
口試委員: |
劉顯仲
John S. Liu 盧煜煬 Louis Y. Y. Lu 陳宥杉 Yu-shan Chen |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 科技管理研究所 Graduate Institute of Technology Management |
論文出版年: | 2014 |
畢業學年度: | 102 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 110 |
中文關鍵詞: | 線性馬達、線型工具機 、主路徑分析 、專利引證網路 、技術軌跡 |
外文關鍵詞: | linear motor, linear machine tools, patent cited network, Technology trajectory |
相關次數: | 點閱:445 下載:7 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
台灣製造業發展中,機械工具機產業一直是扮演相當重要的角色。為提高生產效能,機械加工逐漸朝向高精度、高效能、低碳排放的方向前進,各先進國家已相當仰賴線性馬達(linear motor)技術,應用在工具機驅動系統,多年以來已不斷在技術上有相當大的改良。然而,工具機的相關產業技術發展,也和國家產業方向、區域產業資源有著相當密切的關係,因此,本研究將藉由觀察線性馬達的技術發展,探討關鍵技術之間知識流動、區域群聚和全球技術佈局的現象,以更進一步了解不同國家的企業對於在工具機產業的發展策略。
本研究透過全球專利資料庫USPTO擷取1976年至2013年共2054筆美國已核准專利,由主路徑分析檢視線性馬達應用於工具機的主要技術發展在不同時期的發展軌跡。這些專利共包含434間研發單位,本研究以研發單位間之引證關係,觀察國家之間的群聚現象、多角化情形及技術領域集中化程度,了解知識在不同國家的研發單位之間流動的現象,更進一步以迴歸分析的方式探討國家在進入群聚後的創新能力與經營方式對於知識網路的影響性。
本研究發現,線性馬達的技術發展集中在特定國家,且各國家有不同的主導技術,分別是德國、美國及日本。從研發單位的引證關係中,發現德國為技術先驅者、美國擁有與德國、日本兩大國較高的連結度,而日本公司在網路中居核心角色。另外藉由研發單位的地理位置發現其多具區域群聚現象;瞭解到要增加在知識網路中的重要程度必須進入產業群聚與加強技術創新因素的能力,能力包含提升研發單位在重點技術的研發、適時地拓展自身的技術領域與擔任早期進入者取得技術先佔性,讓研發單位佔據有利的產業地位。
Mechanical machine tool industry, one of the Taiwan's manufacturing industries has been playing an important role during the past few years. In order to improve the production efficiency, machining is gradually moving towards precision, high-performance and low-carbon direction. Linear motor technology has been widely adopted by developed countries as well as their application of drive systems have become a large breakthrough. Because the development of mechanical machine tool industry seems to be embedded with the national industry policy and regional industrial resources, this study aims to explore the knowledge flows and industrial clustering effect as well as global technology layout in this industry, i.e. linear motor. Besides, regression analysis further discusses the effect of industrial clustering effect on innovation capacity and the effect of technology diffusion on knowledge network .
There are a total of 2,054 granted patents collected from USPTO during 1976 to 2013 and consists of 434 involving stakeholders. Technological trajectory shows that the development of linear motor is divided into three different periods and results in clustering phenomenon during each periods. Based on patent citation network, German, United States and Japan are the three important countries that play central role during the evolution of linear motor development and each countries develop different core technology on it. Germany represents the pioneer while United States has strong connections in knowledge diffusion between Germany and Japan. Furthermore, Japan consists of high centrality position in the citation network. Lastly, this study indicates that innovation capability of firms and the clustering effect among firms help to increase the technological position in the knowledge diffusion network.
1. Almeida, Paul. (1996). Knowledge sourcing by foreign multinationals: patent citation analysis in the US semiconductor industry. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 155-165.
2. Almeida, Paul, & Kogut, Bruce. (1999). Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Management Science, 45(7), 905-917.
3. Amsden, Alice H. (1985). The division of labour is limited by the rate of growth of the market: the Taiwan machine tool industry in the 1970s. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 9(3), 271-284.
4. Aronson, Robert B. (1997). Attack of the linear motors. Manufacturing Engineering. May.
5. Arthur, W Brian. (1994). Increasing returns and path dependence in the economy: University of Michigan Press.
6. Association, VDMA Agricultural Machinery. (2012). economic report 2012 (pp. 1-48).
7. Audretsch, David B, & Feldman, Maryann P. (1996a). Innovative clusters and the industry life cycle. Review of Industrial Organization, 11(2), 253-273.
8. Audretsch, David B, & Feldman, Maryann P. (1996b). R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. The American Economic Review, 630-640.
9. Batagelj, Vladimir. (2003). Efficient algorithms for citation network analysis. arXiv preprint cs/0309023.
10. Bernard, Mitchell, & Ravenhill, John. (1995). Beyond product cycles and flying geese: regionalization, hierarchy, and the industrialization of East Asia. World Politics, 47(02), 171-209.
11. Boldea, Ion, & Naser, SA. (1985). Linear motion electromagnetic systems.
12. Burt, Ronald S. (2005). Brokerage and closure: An introduction to social capital: Oxford University Press.
13. Burt, Ronald S. (2009). Structural holes: The social structure of competition: Harvard university press.
14. Chen, Liang-Chih. (2009). Learning through informal local and global linkages: The case of Taiwan's machine tool industry. Research Policy, 38(3), 527-535.
15. d'interet public Reclus, Groupement, Brunet, Roger, & Boyer, Jean-Claude. (1989). Les villes europeennes: rapport pour la Datar, Delegation a l'amenagement du territoire et a l'action regionale: La documentation francaise.
16. Damijan, Jože P, & Rojec, Matija. (2007). Foreign direct investment and catching up of new EU member states: is there a flying geese pattern? Applied Economics Quarterly (formerly: Konjunkturpolitik), 53(2), 91-118.
17. de Nooy, Wouter, Mrvar, Andrej, & Batagelj, Vladimir. (2005). Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek (Vol. 27): Cambridge University Press.
18. Dosi, Giovanni. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: a suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research policy, 11(3), 147-162.
19. Erkorkmaz, K., & Altintas, Y. (2001). High speed CNC system design. Part I: jerk limited trajectory generation and quintic spline interpolation. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 41(9), 1323-1345. doi: 10.1016/s0890-6955(01)00002-5
20. Ernst, H. (1997). The Use of Patent Data for Technological Forecasting: The Diffusion of CNC-Technology in the Machine Tool Industry. Small Business Economics, 9(4), 361-381. doi: 10.1023/A:1007921808138
21. Feldman, Maryann P, & Florida, Richard. (1994). The geographic sources of innovation: technological infrastructure and product innovation in the United States. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 84(2), 210-229.
22. Feser, Edward J, & Bergman, Edward M. (2000). National industry cluster templates: a framework for applied regional cluster analysis. Regional studies, 34(1), 1-19.
23. Gardner Business Media, Inc. (2013). The World Machine Tool Output & Consumption Survey (pp. 1-31).
24. Gardner Business Media, Inc. (2014). The World Machine-Tool Output & Consumption Survey (pp. 1-26).
25. Garud, Raghu, & Nayyar, Praveen R. (1994). Transformative capacity: Continual structuring by intertemporal technology transfer. Strategic Management Journal, 15(5), 365-385.
26. Gieras, Jacek Franciszek, Piech, Zbigniew J, & Tomczuk, Bronisław Zbigniew. (1972). Linear synchronous motors: transportation and automation systems (Vol. 20): CRC press.
27. Gould, Roger V, & Fernandez, Roberto M. (1989). Structures of mediation: A formal approach to brokerage in transaction networks. Sociological Methodology, 89-126.
28. Hall, Bronwyn H, Griliches, Zvi, & Hausman, Jerry A. (1986). Patents and R&D: Is there a lag? : National Bureau of Economic Research Cambridge, Mass., USA.
29. Hall, Bronwyn H, Jaffe, Adam, & Trajtenberg, Manuel. (2005). Market value and patent citations. RAND Journal of economics, 16-38.
30. Hellinger, R., & Mnich, P. (2009). Linear Motor-Powered Transportation: History, Present Status, and Future Outlook. Proceedings of the IEEE, 97(11), 1892-1900. doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2009.2030249
31. Hoover, Edgar M. (1948). The location of economic activity.
32. Hummon, Norman P, & Dereian, Patrick. (1989). Connectivity in a citation network: The development of DNA theory. Social Networks, 11(1), 39-63.
33. I. Boldea, S. A. Nasar. (1986). Electric machine dynamics (Vol. 259): Macmillan.
34. Ion Boldea, Lucian Tutelea. (2010). Electric Machines: Steady State, Transients, and Design With MATLAB (Vol. 775): Taylor & Francis Group.
35. Jaffe, Adam B, & Trajtenberg, Manuel. (1999). International knowledge flows: evidence from patent citations. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 8(1-2), 105-136.
36. Jaffe, Adam B, Trajtenberg, Manuel, & Henderson, Rebecca. (1992). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations: National Bureau of Economic Research.
37. Joe Jablonowski , Nancy Eigel-Miller. (2013). The World Machine Tool Output & Consumption Survey (Vol. 31, pp. 4,5,8,10,14): Gardner Research.
38. Kojima, Kiyoshi. (2000). The “flying geese” model of Asian economic development: origin, theoretical extensions, and regional policy implications. Journal of Asian Economics, 11(4), 375-401.
39. Lee, Kong Rae. (1996). The role of user firms in the innovation of machine tools: The Japanese case. Research Policy, 25(4), 491-507. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(94)00807-8
40. Lissoni, Francesco. (2001). Knowledge codification and the geography of innovation: the case of Brescia mechanical cluster. Research Policy, 30(9), 1479-1500.
41. Liu, John S, & Lu, Louis YY. (2012). An integrated approach for main path analysis: Development of the Hirsch index as an example. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(3), 528-542.
42. Liu, John S, Lu, Louis YY, Lu, Wen-Min, & Lin, Bruce JY. (2013). Data envelopment analysis 1978–2010: A citation-based literature survey. Omega, 41(1), 3-15.
43. Liu, Ren-Jye, & Brookfield, Jonathan. (2000). Stars, rings and tiers: organisational networks and their dynamics in Taiwan's machine tool industry. Long Range Planning, 33(3), 322-348.
44. Liu, Z. Z., Luo, F. L., & Rahman, M. A. (2005). Robust and precision motion control system of linear-motor direct drive for high-speed X-Y table positioning mechanism. Ieee Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 52(5), 1357-1363. doi: 10.1109/tie.2005.855661
45. Narula, Rajneesh. (2002). Innovation systems and ‘inertia’in R&D location: Norwegian firms and the role of systemic lock-in. Research policy, 31(5), 795-816.
46. Nasar, Syed A, & Boldea, Ion. (1976). Linear motion electric machines: Wiley New York.
47. Nasar, Syed Abu. (1990). Electric Machines: Steady-state Operation (Vol. 242): Hemisphere Publishing Corporation.
48. North, Douglass Cecil. (1981). Structure and change in economic history.
49. Piech, Jacek F . Gieras and Zbigniew J . (1974). Linear Synchronous Motors Transportation and Automation Systems. Paper presented at the Linear Electric Machines.
50. Poloujadoff, Michel. (1980). The theory of linear induction machinery: Clarendon Press.
51. Porter, Michael E. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Notions. Harvard business review.
52. Porter, Michael E. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition (Vol. 76): Harvard Business Review Boston.
53. Prahalad, CK, & Hamel, Gary. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Boston (MA), 235-256.
54. Schwab, Klaus. (2012). The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 (Vol. 569): World Economic Forum.
55. Schwab, Klaus, Sala-i-Martin, Xavier, & Greenhill, Robert. (2011). The global competitiveness report 2011-2012.
56. Teece, David J. (1992). Competition, cooperation, and innovation: Organizational arrangements for regimes of rapid technological progress. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 18(1), 1-25.
57. Tijssen, Robert JW. (2001). Global and domestic utilization of industrial relevant science: patent citation analysis of science–technology interactions and knowledge flows. Research Policy, 30(1), 35-54.
58. Verspagen, Bart. (2006). University research, intellectual property rights and European innovation systems. Journal of Economic Surveys, 20(4), 607-632.
59. Verspagen, Bart. (2007). Mapping technological trajectories as patent citation networks: A study on the history of fuel cell research. Advances in Complex Systems, 10(01), 93-115.
60. Von Tunzelmann, Nick, & Acha, Virginia. (2005). Innovation in ‘low-tech’industries. The Oxford handbook of innovation, 407-432.
61. Wessner, Charles W. (2009). Understanding Research, Science and Technology Parks:: Global Best Practice: Report of a Symposium: National Academies Press.