本研究旨在探索金融科技業組織雙歧的矛盾與困難。
20個半結構式的深度訪談結果顯示，策略共識、資訊系統，員工招募和員工培訓是促進金融業組織雙歧的有效手段。此外，運用績效評估，獎勵策略亦是解決組織雙歧在理論與實踐的過程中的有效機制。

The study aims to explore the difficulties during the occurrence of organization and ambidexterity in the financial technology industry.
The result of 20 in-depth semi-structured interviews indicated that the strategic consensus information system, recruitment and staff training are useful methods to facilitate the appearance of organizational ambidexterity, in the banking industry.
Also, the use of performance appraisal, reward practices are the mechanisms to promote the appearance of organizational ambidexterity during the process. Theoretical and practical implication are also discussed.

參考文獻
Abernathy, W. J., & Clark, K. B. (1985). Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction. Research Policy, 14 (1) , 3-22. doi:10.1016/0048-7333 (85) 90021-6
Adler, P. S., Goldoftas, B., & Levine, D. I. (1999). Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the toyota production system. Organization Science, 10 (1), 43-68. doi:10.1287/orsc.10.1.43
Ashkanasy, N. M., Wilderom, C. P. M., & Peterson, M. F. (2000). Intoduction. In N. M. Ashkanasy, C. P. M. Wilderom, & M. F. Peterson (Eds.), Handbook of organizational culture and climate (pp. 1-18). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28 (2), 238-256. doi:10.5465/AMR.2003.9416096
Birkinshaw, J., & Gibson, C. (2004). Building ambidexterity into an organization. Mit Sloan Management Review, 45 (4), 47-55.
Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1998). The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42 (1), 1-34. doi:10.2307/2393807
Burgelman, R. A. (2002). Strategy as vector and the inertia of coevolutionary lock-in. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47 (2), 325-357. doi:10.2307/3094808
Burns, T., & Stalker, G. M. (1961). The management of innovation. London, England: Tavistock.
Cao, Q., Gedajlovic, E., & Zhang, H. (2009). Unpacking organizational ambidexterity: Dimensions, contingencies, and synergistic effects. Organization Science, 20 (4) , 781-796. doi:10.1287/orsc.1090.0426
Collins, C. J., & Smith, K. G. (2006) . Knowledge exchange and combination: The role of human resource practices in the performance of high-technology firms. Academy of Management Journal, 49 (3), 544-560. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2006.21794671
Dewar, R. D., & Dutton, J. E. (1986). The adoption of radical and incremental innovations: An empirical analysis. Management Science, 32 (11), 1422-1433. doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.11.1422
Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47 (2), 209-226. doi:10.2307/20159573
Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. G., & Shalley, C. E. (2006). The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49 (4), 693-706. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2006.22083026
Gupta, A. K., Tesluk, P. E., & Taylor, M. S. (2007). Innovation at and across multiple levels of analysis. Organization Science, 18 (6), 885-897. doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0337
Jansen, J. J. P., Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, 52 (11), 1661-1674. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0576
Jung, D. D., Wu, A., & Chow, C. W. (2008). Towards understanding the direct and indirect effects of ceos' transformational leadership on firm innovation. The Leadership Quarterly, 19 (5), 582-594. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.07.007
Lewis, M. W. (2000). Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Academy of Management Review, 25 (4), 760-776. doi:10.5465/AMR.2000.3707712
Lubatkin, M. H., Simsek, Z., Ling, Y., & Veiga, J. F. (2006). Ambidexterity and performance in small- to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. Journal of Management, 32 (5), 646-672. doi:10.1177/0149206306290712
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2 (1), 71-87. doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
Raisch, S., & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management, 34 (3), 375-409. doi:10.1177/0149206308316058
Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G., & Tushman, M. L. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organization Science, 20 (4) , 685-695. doi:10.1287/orsc.1090.0428
Smith, K. G., Collins, C. J., & Clark, K. D. (2005). Existing knowledge, knowledge creation capability, and the rate of new product introduction in high-technology firms. Academy of Management Journal, 48 (2), 346-357. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2005.16928421
Smith, W. K., & Tushman, M. L. (2005). Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organization Science, 16(5), 522-536. doi:10.1287/orsc.1050.0134
Tushman, M. L. (1997). Winning through innovation. Strategy & Leadership, 25 (4) , 14-19. doi:10.1108/eb054591
Tushman, M. L., & Anderson, P. (1986). Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31 (3) , 439-465. doi:10.2307/2392832
Tushman, M. L., & O'Reilly, C. A. (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38 (4) , 8-30. doi:10.2307/41165852
Volberda, H. W., & Van Bruggen, G. H. (1997). Environmental turbulence: A look into its dimensionality. In M. T. A. Belmans (Ed.), Dynamiek in Bedrijfsvoering. Enschede, The Netherlands: NOBO.
周海濤、李永賢、張蘅(譯)(2009)。個案研究：設計與方法。台北市：五南。(Robert K. Yin, 1994)