動態能力理論(Dynamic Capability Theory)的概念在近年逐漸受到關注，隨 著科技的發展以及市場的變化，迫使企業必須更快速的反應市場需求以維持競 爭優勢，因此企業得以改變能力的能力更顯重要。本研究探討單位雙歧在企業 內對個人之任務績效的影響，並研究兩者間的中介與調節機制，研究對象為 38 間企業之單位，包含 42 位單位主管與 204 位員工，共 246 名。研究採用多層次 結構方程模型(Multilevel Structural Equation Modeling, MSEM)進行資料合併檢 驗，研究結果顯示集體效能不會中介與任務績效之間的關係；而吸收能力會調 節集體效能和任務績效之關係。

Dynamic Capability Theory has received more attention recent years. With the
rapid development of technology and business, companies are forced to give quick
responds to market for the competitive advantage. That is, the ability to change the
capability of a company seems significant. This study explores how Unit
Ambidexterity impact individual Task Performance within company. In addition, the
mediating mechanism and moderating mechanism between the two will be discussed
in this study. The data is collected from 38 units of different companies including 42
unit managers and 204 employees. In this study, multilevel structural equation
modeling(MSEM) is used for data combination testing. The result indicates collective
efficacy doesn’t mediate the relation between unit ambidexterity and task
performance; absorptive capacity does moderate the relation between collective
efficacy and task performance.
This study contributes to Unit ambidexterity and Task performance research by
revealing the mediating mechanism and moderating mechanism.

Arthey, T. R./Orth, M. S. (1999). Emerging competency methods for the future. In: Human Resource Management, Fall, 38(3), 215-226.

Bandalos, D. L. (2002). The effects of item parceling on goodness-of-fit and parameter estimate bias in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(1), 78-102.

Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual review of psychology, 52(1), 1-26.

Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99-120.

Barreto, I. (2010). Dynamic Capabilities: A Review of Past Research and an Agenda for the Future. Journal of Management, 36(1), 256-280.

Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes instructural models.Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238.

Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis.

Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. M. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. Personnel Selection in Organizations; San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 71.

Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit.Sage focus editions, 154, 136-136.

Cao, Qing, Simsek, Zeki and Zhang, Hongping (2010). Modeling the joint impact of the CEO and the TMT on organizational ambidexterity. Journal of Management Studies, 47, 1272-1296.

Chang, Y.-Y. (2014), A multilevel examination of high-performance work systems and unit-level organisational ambidexterity. Human Resource Management Journal, 25(1), 79-101.

Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128-152.

Colbert, B. A. (2004). The complex resource-based view: Implications for theory and practice of strategic human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 29(3), 341-358.

Eisenhardt K, Martin J. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strategic Management Journal, October–November Special Issue, 21, 1105-1121.

Fernhaber SA, Patel PC. (2012). How do young firms manage product portfolio complexity? The role of absorptive capacity and ambidexterity. Strategic Management Journal, 33(13), 1516-1539.

G Chen, PD Bliese (2002), The Role of Different Levels of Leadership in Predicting Self- and Collective Efficacy: Evidence for Discontinuity. Journal of Applied Psychology 2002, Vol. 87, No. 3, 549-556

Gibson, C.B. and Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209-226.

Goddard, R. D., Hoy, W. K., & Hoy, A. W. (2004). Collective efficacy beliefs: Theoretical developments, empirical evidence, and future directions. Educational researcher, 33(3), 3-13.

Goddard, R. G., LoGerfo, L. and Hoy, W. K. (2004). High School Accountability: The Role of Collective Effi cacy. Educational Policy, 18 (30), 403-25.

McCall, R. B., & Kagan, J. (1975). Fundamental statistics for psychology (No. BF39. M3 1970.). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

Gully, S. M., Incalcaterra, K. A., Joshi, A., & Beaubien, J. M. (2002). A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. Journal of applied psychology, 87(5), 819.

Hayton, J. C., & Kelley, D. J. (2006). A competency‐based framework for promoting corporate entrepreneurship. Human Resource Management: Published in Cooperation with the School of Business Administration, The University of Michigan and in alliance with the Society of Human Resources Management, 45(3), 407-427.

He, Z. L., & Wong, P. K. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization science, 15(4), 481-494.

Helfat CE. (1997). Know-how and asset complementarity and dynamic capability accumulation. Strategic Management Journal, 18(5), 339-360.

Helfat C, Peteraf M. (2003). The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal, October Special Issue, 24, 997-1010.

Liao, H., Toya, K., Lepak, D. P., & Hong, Y. (2009). Do they see eye to eye? Management and employee perspectives of high-performance work systems and influence processes on service quality. Journal of applied psychology, 94(2), 371.

Hoyt, C. L., Murphy, S. E., Halverson, S. K., & Watson, C. B. (2003). Group leadership: Efficacy and effectiveness. Group Dynamics, Theory, Research, and Practice, 7, 259-274.

Hughes, P., Hodgkinson, I. R., Hughes, M., & Arshad, D. (2018). Explaining the entrepreneurial orientation–performance relationship in emerging economies: The intermediate roles of absorptive capacity and improvisation. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 35(4), 1025-1053.

James, L. R. (1982). Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(2), 219-229.

Jansen, J. J. P., Simsek, Z., & Cao, Q. (2012). Ambidexterity and performance in multi-unit contexts: Cross-level moderating effects of structural and resources attributes. Strategic Management Journal, 33, 1286-1303. Jansen, J. J., Van den

Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2005). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and ambidexterity: The impact of environmental and organizational antecedents. Schmalenbach Business Review, 57(4), 351-363.

Jansen, J. J., Van Den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2005). Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: how do organizational antecedents matter? Academy of management journal, 48(6), 999-1015.

Jex, S. M., & Bliese, P. D. (1999). Efficacy beliefs as a moderator of the impact of work-related stressors: A multilevel study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 349-361.

Junni, P., Sarala, R. M., Taras, V. A. S., & Tarba, S. Y. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity and performance: A metaanalysis. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 299-312.

J., Salk, J. E., & Lyles, M. A. (2001). Absorptive capacity, learning, and performance in international joint ven tures. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 1139-1161.

Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (Vol. 2, p. 528). New York: Wiley.

Knudsen, T., & Madsen, T. K. (2002). Export strategy: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 18(4), 475-502.

Landis, R. S., Beal, D. J., & Tesluk, P. E. (2000). A comparison of approaches to forming composite measures in structural equation models. Organizational Research Methods, 3(2), 186-207.

Larsson, R., Bengtsson, L., Henriksson, K., & Sparks, J. (1998). The interorganizational learning dilemma: Collective knowledge development in strategic alliances. Organization science, 9(3), 285-305.

Lepak, D., Liao, H., Chung, Y. and Harden, E. (2006). ‘A conceptual review of human resource management systems in strategic human resource management research. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 25, 217- 271.

Levenson, A. R., Van der Stede, W. A., & Cohen, S. G. (2006). Measuring the relationship between managerial competencies and performance. Journal of Management, 32, 360-380.

Lindsley, D. H., Brass, D. J., & Thomas, J. B. (1994). Efficacyperformance spirals: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 20, 645-678.

Little, B. L. & Madigan, R. M. (1997). The relationship between collective efficacy and performance in manufacturing work groups. Small Group Research, 28, 517- 34.

Meade, A. W., & Kroustalis, C. M. (2006). Problems with item parceling for confirmatory factor analytic tests of measurement invariance. Organizational Research Methods, 9(3), 369-403

O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185-206.

Patel, P. C., Kohtamäki, M., Parida, V., & Wincent, J. (2015). Entrepreneurial orientation‐as‐experimentation and firm performance: The enabling role of absorptive capacity. Strategic Management Journal, 36(11), 1739-1749.

Prussia, G. E., & Kinicki, A. J. (1996). A motivational investigation of group effectiveness using social-cognitive theory. Joumal of Applied Psychology, 81, 187-198.

Saks, A. M. (1995). Longitudinal field investigation of the moderating and mediating effects of self-efficacy on the relationship between training and newcomer adjustment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 211-215

Schilke O. (2014a). On the contingent value of dynamic capabilities for competitive advantage: The nonlinear moderating effect of environmental dynamism. Strategic Management Journal 35(2), 179-203.

Schilke, O. (2014). Second-order dynamic capabilities: How do they matter? Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(4), 368-380.

Sanghi, S. (2016). The handbook of competency mapping: understanding, designing and implementing competency models in organizations. SAGE publications India.

Sirmon, D. G., Hitt, M. A., & Ireland, R. D. (2007). Managing Firm Resources in Dynamic Environments to Create Value: Looking Inside the Black Box. Academy of Management Review, 32, 273-292.

Spencer, L. M., & Spencer, P. S. M. (2008). Competence at Work models for superior performance. John Wiley & Sons.

Stajkovic, A. D., & Luthans, F. (1998). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological bulletin, 124(2), 240.

Subramaniam, M., M.A. Youndt. (2005). The Influence of Intellectual Capital on the Types of Innovative Capabilities. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 450-463

Teece, D. J. (2014). A dynamic capabilities-based entrepreneurial theory of the multinational enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(1), 8-37.

Teece, D.J., (2012). Dynamic capabilities: routines versus entrepreneurial action. Journal of Management Studies, 49(8), 1395-1401

Teece, D. J. (2016). Dynamic capabilities and entrepreneurial management in large organizations: toward a theory of the (entrepreneurial) firm. European Economic Review, 86, 202-216.

Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.

Tepper, B. J., Dimotakis, N., Lambert, L. S., Koopman, J., Matta, F. K., Man Park, H., & Goo, W. (2018). Examining follower responses to transformational leadership from a dynamic, person–environment fit perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 61(4), 1343-1368.

Tsai, W. (2001). Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 996-1004.

Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficientfor maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38(1), 1-10.

Tuner, N., Swart, J. and Maylor, H. (2013). ‘Mechanisms for managing ambidexterity: a review and research agenda’. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(3), 317-3332.

Veysey BM, Messner SF. (1999). Further testing of social disorganization theory: an elaboration of Sampson and Groves’s “community structure and crime.” J. Res. Crime Delinq. 36, 156-74

S Raisch, J Birkinshaw (2008), Organizational Ambidexterity: Antecedents, Outcomes, and Moderators. Journal of management 34(3), 375-409

Webster, J., & Martocchio, J. J. (1995). The differential effects of software training previews on training outcomes. Journal of Management, 21, 757-787.

Winter SG. (2003). Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, October Special Issue, 24, 991-996.

Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, conceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27, 185-203.

Zahra, S. A., & Hayton, J. C. (2008). The effect of international venturing on firm performance: The moderating influence of absorptive capacity. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(2), 195-220.

Simsek, Z. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Towards a multilevel understanding. Journal of management studies, 46(4), 597-624.

Zollo, M., and S.G. Winter (2002). “Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities.” Organization Science, 13, 339-351.

Zott C. (2003). Dynamic capabilities and the emergence of intraindustry differential firm performance: insights from a simulation study. Strategic Management Journal, 24(2), 97-125