簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 林鼎哲
Ding-che Lin
論文名稱: 高績效工作系統與經理人雙歧之跨層次關係-以網絡關係、共通語言與符號為中介變數
The Relationship Between High Performance Work System and Manager Ambidexterity Mediated by Network and Shared Language and Codes
指導教授: 張譯尹
Yi-ying Chang
口試委員: 曾盛恕
none
邱文宏
none
紀慧如
none
許獻元
none
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 企業管理系
Department of Business Administration
論文出版年: 2014
畢業學年度: 102
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 55
中文關鍵詞: 高績效工作系統經理人雙歧網絡關係共通語言與符號
外文關鍵詞: high performance work system, manager ambidexterity, network, shared language and codes
相關次數: 點閱:244下載:8
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 組織雙歧 (organizational ambidexterity) 的概念近年來備受重視。過去的研究主要著重於探討如何使企業同時做好探索型創新及應用型創新進而提升組織績效,而本研究企圖從策略性人力資源管理的觀點出發,探討公司層級的高績效工作系統對個體層級的經理人雙歧 (manager ambidexterity) 之影響。另外,兩者間跨層次的中介機制也會在本研究中進行探討。本研究的研究對象為184位管理者、346位員工,分別隸屬於79個部門及33間公司。研究結果顯示高績效工作系統會透過公司整體的網絡關係以及單位的共通語言與符號正向影響經理人雙歧;另外網絡關係亦會透過單位內的共通符號與語言影響經理人的創新工作表現。


    Many researchers have focus on the concept of organizational ambidexterity. Previous papers investigate that how to achieve exploration and exploitation related activities. Based on these literatures, we attempt to use strategic human resource management view to discuss that company-level high performance work system influence individual-level manager's behavior. We also discuss the cross level mediation mechanisms such as company-level network and unit-level shared codes and language between high performance work system and manager ambidexterity.

    第一章 緒論 1 第一節研究背景與研究動機 1 第二章 文獻探討 4 第一節高績效工作系統 4 第二節高績效工作系統與經理人雙歧 7 第三節高績效工作系統、網絡關係、 經理人雙歧之跨層次中介 13 第四節高績效工作系統、共通語言與符號、 經理人雙歧之跨層次中介 16 第五節網絡關係、共通語言與符號、經理人雙歧 之跨層次中介 18 第六節研究架構與研究假說 19 第三章 研究方法 20 第一節研究設計與研究對象 20 第二節研究工具與測量方法 22 第三節資料分析方法 25 第四章 研究結果 28 第一節描述統計分析 28 第二節相關分析 29 第三節資料分析 (ICC1,ICC2,Rwg) 31 第四節跨層次分析假設檢驗 32 第五章 結論 36 第一節研究結果與討論 36 第二節管理意涵 38 第三節研究限制與未來研究方向 39 第六章 參考文獻 40 附錄:研究問卷 45

    Andriopoulos, C., & Lewis, M. (2009). Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organization Science, 20(4), 696-717.
    Arthur, J. B. (1994). Effects of human resource systems on manufacturing performance and turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 670-687.
    Becker, B., & Gerhart, B. (1996). The impact of human resource management on organizational performance: Progress and prospects. Academy of management journal, 39(4), 779-801.
    Becker, B. E., Huselid, M. A., Becker, B. E., & Huselid, M. A. (1998). High performance work systems and firm performance: A synthesis of research and managerial implications. In Research in personnel and human resource management.
    Benner, M.J., & Tushman, M.L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28(2): 238-256.
    Birkinshaw, J., C. Gibson. (2004). Building ambidexterity into an organization. Mit Sloan Management Rev. 45(Summer) 47-55
    Birkinshaw, J. & Gibson, C.B. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 209-226.
    Bliese, P.D. (2000) An introduction to multilevel modeling techniques﹝Book review﹞. Personnel Psychology, 53, 1062-1065.
    Cao, Q., Gedajlovic, E., & Zhang, H. (2009). Unpacking organizational ambidexterity: Dimensions, contingencies, and synergistic effects. Organization Science, 20(4), 781-796.
    Cao, Q., Simsek, Z., & Zhang, H. (2010). Modelling the joint impact of the CEO and the TMT on organizational ambidexterity. Journal of Management Studies,47(7), 1272-1296.
    Chang, Y. Y., Gong, Y., & Peng, M. W. (2012). Expatriate knowledge transfer, subsidiary absorptive capacity, and subsidiary performance. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 927-948.
    Collins, C. J., & Smith, K. G. (2006). Knowledge exchange and combination: The role of human resource practices in the performance of high-technology firms. Academy of management journal, 49(3), 544-560.
    Duncan, R.B.(1976). The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures for innovation, in Kilmann, R.H., Pondy, L. R. and Slevin, D.(Eds), The Management of Organization Design. New York, NY: North-Holland, 167-188.
    Floyd, S.W., & Lane, P.J. (2000). Strategizing throughout the organization: Managing role conflict in strategic renewal. Academy of Management Review, 25, 154-177.
    Guthrie, J. P. (2001). High-involvement work practices, turnover, and productivity: Evidence from New Zealand. Academy of management Journal,44(1), 180-190.
    Hansen, M.T., Podolny, M.M., & Pfeffer, J. (2001). So many ties, so little time: A task contingency perspective on the value of social capital in organizations. Social Capital of Organizations, 18, 21-57.
    He, Z. L., & Wong, P. K. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization science, 15(4), 481-494.
    Holmqvist, M. (2004). Experiential learning process of exploitation and exploration within and between organizations: An empirical study of product development. Organization Science, 15, 70-81.

    Huselid, M.A. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 635-672.
    James, L. R. (1982). Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement.Journal of applied psychology, 67(2), 219.
    Jansen, J. J., Simsek, Z., & Cao, Q. (2012). Ambidexterity and performance in multiunit contexts: Cross‐level moderating effects of structural and resource attributes. Strategic Management Journal, 33(11), 1286-1303.
    Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8 user's reference guide. Scientific Software International.
    Kang S.C. & Snell, S.A. (2009). Intellectual capital architectures and ambidextrous learning: A framework for human resource management. Journal of Management Studies, 46(1): 65-92.
    Lepak, D.P., Liao, H., Chung., & Harden, E. (2006). A conceptual review of human resource management systems in strategic human resource management research. In J. Martocchio (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resource management (pp. 217-271). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
    Lepak, D.P., & Snell, S.A. (2002). Examining the human resource architecture: The relationships among human capital, employment, and human resource configurations. Journal of management, 28, 517-543.
    Liao, H., Toya, K., Lepak, D.P. & Hong, Y. (2009). Do They See Eye to Eye? Management and Employee Perspectives of High-Performance Work Systems and Influence Processes on Service Quality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 371-391.
    Lubatkin, M. H., Simsek, Z., Ling, Y., & Veiga, J. F. (2006). Ambidexterity and performance in small-to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. Journal of management, 32(5), 646-672.
    March, J. G. 1991. Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning. Organization Science, 2 , 71-87.
    McGrath, R.G. (2001). Exploratory learning, innovative capacity, and managerial oversight. Academy of Management Journal, 30, 7-32.
    Mom, T.J.M., Van Den Bosch, F.A.J., & Volberda, H.W. (2009). Understanding variation in manager’s ambidexterity: Investigating direct and interaction effects of formal structural and personal coordination mechanisms. Organization Science, 20, 812-828.
    Mom, T. J., Fourne S. P., & Jansen J. J.,(2014). Manaers' work experience, ambidexterity and performance: the contingency role of the work context.
    Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23: 242-266.
    Noe, R.A. (1999). Employee training and development. Boston: Irwin Mcgraw-Hill.
    O’Reilly, C.A., M. L. Tushman. (2004). The ambidextrous organization. Harvard Bus. Rev. 82, 74-81.
    Patel, P.C., Messersmith, J.G., & Lepak, D.P. (2012). Walking the Tight-rope: An Assessment of the Relationship between High Performance Work Systems and Organizational Ambidexterity, Academy of Management Journal, forthcoming.
    Prieto, I. M., & Pilar Perez Santana, M. (2012). Building ambidexterity: The role of human resource practices in the performance of firms from Spain. Human Resource Management, 51(2), 189-211.
    Raisch, S., & Birkinshaw, J. (2008) Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes and moderators. Journal of Management, 34, 375-409.
    Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G., & Tushman, M. L. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organization Science, 20(4), 685-695.
    Smith, W.K., & Tushman, M.L. (2005). Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organization Science, 16, 522-536.
    Takeuchi, R., Chen, G., & Lepak, D. P. (2009). Through The Looking Glass of A Social System: Cross-Level Effects of High-Performance Work Systems on Employees' Attitudes. Personnel Psychology, 62(1), 1-29.
    Tsai, W. (2000). Social capital, strategic relatedness and the formation of intraorganizational linkages. Strategic Management journal, 21, 925-939.
    Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. (1988). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 464-476.
    Tushman, M.L., & O'Reilly, C.A. (1996). Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change. California Management Review, 38: 8-29.
    Van Maanen, J., & Schein, E.H. (1979). Toward a theory of organizational socialization. In B.M. Staw (Ed.), Research in organizational behavior, 1, 209-264.
    Wright, P.M., & McMahan, G.C. (1992). Theoretical perspectives for strategic human resource management. Journal of Management, 18, 295-320.

    QR CODE