本研究從組織雙歧的觀點，討論企業中的轉換型領導如何從人力資本強化組織雙歧，進一步提升組織績效，然而在技術日新月異的發展，企業若要保持競爭優勢，必需面對動態的環境，所以企業不斷地發展新的思維，才能提升組織的能力。因此，企業必須創造二個以上的核心能耐，主管以追求探索型與開發型的創新，其組織雙歧的概念越來越多企業重視這個議題。 又因為員工是企業重要的資產，若能了解人力資本的運作，故能強化組織雙歧，因『才』施教，創造更高的組織績效；企業中，主管與員工的關系，密不可分，所以主管的領導風格也會影響員工的各方面發展，如知識、技能、創新能力，因此，企業以轉換型領導風格如何透過人力資本的運作並且強化組織雙歧發展的聯合中介效果，以提升組織績效，為本研究的重點。
本研究透過問卷調查來蒐集資料。本文的研究樣本主要施測對象來自於中國大陸的台商、陸商。共計發放出650份紙本問卷，回收585份有效配對樣本，其中第一階層主管共62份、第二階層主管共149份、第三階層主管共358份，並採用結構方程模式的路徑分析方法探討各個變項之間的關系。實證分析，驗證轉換型領導確定會對於人力資本影響，進而強化組織雙歧，提升組織績效。最後本研究根據研究結果，分析說明研究限制、未來研究方向與實務上的意涵。

In this study, from an point of organizational ambidexterity to discuss how the transformational leadership in an enterprise strengthen and further enhance organizational performance by the organization of human capital. However, today the rapid development of technology, companies have to face a dynamic environment which is necessary if want to remain competitive. The companies keep developing new ways of thinking to enhance abilities. Therefore, enterprises must create two or more core competences. Directors pursue exploration and development-oriented innovation model. The concept of organizational ambidexterity is more and more enterprises are attending. And also because employees are important assets for an enterprise which can strengthen and be organizational ambidexterity when understand human capital. Put right person in right place that make more greater organizational performance. In an enterprise, the relationship of director and stuffs is inseparable, so the leadership style of director will affect stuffs various aspects of development. Such as: knowledge, skills, ability of innovate. So, how the enterprise operate and strengthen to become organizational ambidexterity with transformational leadership to upgrade organization performance which is the point of this study.
This study collect data through questionnaires. Samples were mainly target with Taiwanese businessman and Chinese businessman. Issued: 650 copies; valid questionnaires: 585 copies. First class of director: 62 copies; second: 149 copies; third: 358 copies. Using structural equation modeling to analysis the various variables of relationship. After the empirical, validation transformational will determine the impact of human capital to strength and be organizational ambidexterity , improve organization performance. Finally, based on the research results, analysis shows limitation of study future research directions and practical implications.

英文文獻
Andriopoulos, C., & Lewis, M. W. (2008). Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation. Organization Science, 20(4), 696-717. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1080.0406
Avolio, Bruce J., & Bass, Bernard M. (1995). Individual consideration viewed at multiple levels of analysis: A multi-level framework for examining the diffusion of transformational leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 199–218.
Avolio, Bruce J., Bass, Bernard M., & Jung, Dong I. (1999). Re-examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the multi-factor leadership questionnaire. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72, 441–462.
Baron, Reuben M., & Kenny, David A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychology research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. , 51(6), pp. 1173-1182.
Bass, Bernard M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations: New York : Free Press.
Bass, Bernard M. (1990). From Transactional to Transformational Leadership- Learning to Share the Vision. Organizational Dynamics, 18(3), 19-31. doi: 10.1016/0090-2616(90)90061-S
Bass, Bernard M. (1995). Theory of transformational leadership redux. Leadership Quarterly, 6(4), 463-478.
Bass, Bernard M., & Avolio, Bruce J. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership: Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Bass, Bernard M., & Avolio, Bruce J. (1995). MLQ multifactor leadership questionnaire for research: Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden.
Becker, G. S. (1976). The economic approach to human behavior: Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Becker, G. S. (1993). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis with special
reference to education: Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Birasnav, M., Rangnekar, S., & Dalpati, A. (2011). Transformational leadership and human capital benefits: the role of knowledge management. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 32(2), 106-126. doi: 10.1108/01437731111112962
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables: New York: John Wiley & Son, Inc.
Bontis, Nick, & Nikitopoulos, Danny. (2001). Thought leadership on intellectual capital. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2(3), 183-191. doi: 10.1108/14691930110400182
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit, In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models.: Newsbury Park, CA: Sage.
Bryant, S. E. (2003). The Role of Transformational and Transactional Leadership in Creating, Sharing and Exploiting Organizational Knowledge. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 9(4), 32-44. doi: 10.1177/107179190300900403
Burns, J. M. (1999). Leadership: New York: Harper & Row.
Cao, Q., Gedajlovic, E., & Zhang, H. (2009). Unpacking Organizational Ambidexterity: Dimensions, Contingencies, and Synergistic Effects. Organization Science, 20(4), 781-796. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1090.0426
Collins, Christopher J., & Smith, Ken G. (2006). Knowledge exchange and combination The role of human resource practices in the performance of high-technology firms. Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), 544–560.
Day, David V. (2000). Leadership development-- A review in context. Leadership Quarterly, 11(4), 581-613(533).
Fornell, Claes, & Larcker, David F. Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error.
Fornell, Claes, & Larcker, David F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable and Measurement Errors. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice: New York: Basic Books.
Gibson, Cristina B., & Birkinshaw, Julian. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209-226.
Gong, Y., Law, K. S., Chang, S., & Xin, K. R. (2009). Human resources management and firm performance: The differential role of managerial affective and continuance commitment. J Appl Psychol, 94(1), 263-275. doi: 10.1037/a0013116
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. . (1998). Applied Multivariate Data Analysis. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
Jansen, Justin J. P., Van Den Bosch, Frans A. J., & Volberda, Henk W. (2006). Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation, and Performance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators. Management Science, 52(11), 1661-1674. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0576
Jansen, Justin J. P., Vera, Dusya, & Crossan, Mary. (2009). Strategic leadership for exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of environmental dynamism. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(1), 5-18. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.11.008
Judge, T. A., & Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: a meta-analytic test of their relative validity. J Appl Psychol, 89(5), 755-768. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.755
Kang, Sung-Choon, & Snell, Scott A. (2009). Intellectual Capital Architectures and Ambidextrous Learning: A Framework for Human Resource Management. Journal of Management Studies, 46(1), 65-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00776.x
Lepak, D. P., & Snell, S. A. The human resource architecture: Toward a theory of human capital allocation and development. Academy ofManagement Review, 24, 31–48.
March, James G. (1991). Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning. Organization Science, Vol. 2(No. 1), pp. 71-87.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory: New York: McGraw-Hill.
Ortt, J. Roland, & Duin, Patrick A. van der. (2008). The evolution of innovation management towards contextual innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 11(4), 522-538. doi: 10.1108/14601060810911147
Preacher, Kristopher J., & Hayes, Andrew F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(4), 717-731.
Preacher, Kristopher J., & Hayes, Andrew F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879-891. doi: 10.3758/brm.40.3.879
Rafferty, Alannah E., & Griffin, Mark A. (2004). Dimensions of transformational leadership: Conceptual and empirical extensions. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(3), 329-354. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.02.009
Raisch, S., & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Organizational Ambidexterity: Antecedents, Outcomes, and Moderators. Journal of Management, 34(3), 375-409. doi: 10.1177/0149206308316058
Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G., & Tushman, M. L. (2009). Organizational Ambidexterity: Balancing Exploitation and Exploration for Sustained Performance. Organization Science, 20(4), 685-695. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1090.0428
S. Jarvenpaa, N. Tractinsky and M. Vitale. (2000). Consumer Trust in an Internet Store. Information Technology and Management, 1(1-2:45-71).
Schultz, Theodore W. (1961). Investment in human capital. American Economic Review, 51(5), 1035-1039.
Sharma, S. (1996). Applied Multivariat Techeniques: New York: J. Wuley.
Snell, Scott A., & James W. Dean, Jr. (1992). Integrated Manufacturing and Human Resource Management: A Human Capital Perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 35(3), 467-504.
Tepper, Bennett J., Moss, Sherry E., & Duffy, Michelle K. (2011). Predictors of abusive supervision Supervisor perceptions of deep-level dissimilarity, relationship conflict, and subordinate performance. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 279–294.
Yukl, Gary. (1994). Leadership in organizations. NJ: Prentice -Hall: Englewodd cliffs.
Zhu, Weichun, Chew, Irene K. H., & Spangler, William D. (2005). CEO transformational leadership and organizational outcomes: The mediating role of human–capital-enhancing human resource management. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(1), 39-52. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.06.001
Zi-Lin, He, & Wong, Poh-Kam. (2004). Exploration vs. Exploitation- An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis. Organization Science, 15(4), 481-494.
中文文獻
彭台光, & 林鉦棽. (2006). 管理研究中的共同方法變異：問題本質、影響、測試和補救. Journal of Management, 23(1), 77-98.
溫福星, & 邱皓政. (2012). 多層次模式方法論：階層線性模式的關鍵問題與試解: 前程文化.
蕭文龍. (2009). 多變量分析最佳入門實用書(第二版)：SPSS+LISREL: 碁峰.